Reply to: Langham - looks a little sus to me

[XTC]

Yeah he 'buggered' some young bird.

[smee.again]

He is guilty as sin........

[Diver]

The latest news is that pictures taken from Langhams laptop were shown to the jury, these upset several of the jurors and the trail had to be adjourned.

[OwlHoot]

If he wanted to view such images as "Research", then he could have approached the Police and asked if he could view some of the siezed material they have.

With Paul Whitehouse stating that he knew nothing about this research, Chris is on a real sticky wicket.

Didn't all this come to light because he was involved with a minor in real life?

Or maybe he'll claim that was just more "hands on" research?

[Burdock]

[

I didn't know tadpoles were also called pollywogs. How strange.

send him down!! send him down!!!!

(rips beard out)

[Moose423956]

FWOAHR

I didn't know tadpoles were also called pollywogs. How strange.

[Burdock]

What's wrong with looking at pictures of tadpoles? They're cute.

send him down!!!

[Moose423956]

Moose was clearly researching.

What's wrong with looking at pictures of tadpoles? They're cute.

[Burdock]

Yes, your records do indicate some interesting hobbies.
I charge a small fee to delete Moose423956.log.tar.gz.

Moose was clearly researching.

[NoddY]

Oh sh1t!

Yes, your records do indicate some interesting hobbies.
I charge a small fee to delete Moose423956.log.tar.gz.

[Moose423956]

Your search engine, ISP keep a record of it for 18 months or more

every site you visit is logged, every page every download, every Email.

Oh sh1t!

[Diver]

All your downloads and emails can be monitored!

Your search engine, ISP keep a record of it for 18 months or more

every site you visit is logged, every page every download, every Email.

[Alf W]

And how did they know he'd been downloading child porn? Do these things get monitored?

All your downloads and emails can be monitored!

[dang65]

Do you reckon it's possible to judge the guilt of these celebrities by whether their celebrity mates stand up for them? For example, that Matthew Kelly one: (off wiki) "In January 2003 he was arrested after an allegation that he had sexually abused a boy under 16." I remember there was a flood of celebs coming forward to say it wasn't possible and that he was a lovely bloke who would never do such a thing. And all charges were dropped of course. What was amazing about that example was that it happens so rarely. Jonathan King, Gary Glitter, Pete Townsend, Michael Barrymore... there must be loads more, and now Chris Langham. I don't recall any of those having many, if any, fellow celebrities speaking out in their favour. I dunno, maybe these celebs just want to keep their heads down and stay out of it.

[richard-af]

Yeah, right.

Research? RESEARCH??

I find it just incredible that he's proffered THAT as his "excuse".