I think it can help if you have a long contract at a particular firm on your CV. It indicates the company found you helpful and didn't want to ditch you at the first opportunity. Many '3 months+' gigs use the initial 3 months as a trial period. However the converse is not true, a short stint doesn't mean you weren't any good, it just means it was a short stint.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Should I Renew?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by zeitghostThere must be something in the air...Comment
-
Originally posted by axonrgThanks everyone, you've all been really helpfulHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
-
Originally posted by axonrgThanks everyone, you've all been really helpful
has this ever happened before?Comment
-
Originally posted by axonrgHi All,
First time poster, so please be gentle
I'm in the middle of a 3 month contract which I'm NOT keen to renew (if offered). The problem is that I'm not sure how a mere 3 month stint at one company would look on my CV? My previous contracts have lasted 6-18 months.
Would a mere 3 month stint look bad and should I look to renew for at least another 3 months, or do employers care less about this for contractors? What are people's experiences?
This is further complicated by the fact that I've just taken a year long career break to go travelling.
4 monther, 3 monther, it really doesnt matter.
Im currently on a 12 monther, all that really matters is the big names and big projects and big cash.Comment
-
Originally posted by axonrgHi All,
First time poster, so please be gentle
I'm in the middle of a 3 month contract which I'm NOT keen to renew (if offered). The problem is that I'm not sure how a mere 3 month stint at one company would look on my CV? My previous contracts have lasted 6-18 months.
Would a mere 3 month stint look bad and should I look to renew for at least another 3 months, or do employers care less about this for contractors? What are people's experiences?
This is further complicated by the fact that I've just taken a year long career break to go travelling.
NEXT.Comment
-
Originally posted by el dudermate, i came back from a year off, and worked a few short term contracts.
4 monther, 3 monther, it really doesnt matter.
Im currently on a 12 monther, all that really matters is the big names and big projects and big cash.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Comment