• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BBC Have your Say - paedophiles

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by portseven
    If its a 16yr old lad who boff's his 15yr old girlfriend then no. Like most things there are shades of grey
    I find it difficult to understand why people confuse paedophilia with underage sex.

    If the child has passed puberty then it cannot be called paedophillia
    & a 16 year old bonking a 15 year old has been happening forever... all that stops it (ha!) is the age of consent (which varies by country)

    I think also that paedos are not attracted to children once past puberty
    How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Troll
      I find it difficult to understand why people confuse paedophilia with underage sex.

      If the child has passed puberty then it cannot be called paedophillia
      & a 16 year old bonking a 15 year old has been happening forever... all that stops it (ha!) is the age of consent (which varies by country)

      I think also that paedos are not attracted to children once past puberty
      I'd go along with that. We are mixing up paedophilia with the age of consent.

      The way I see it, a paedo is unnaturally attracted to pre-pubescent kids. Being attracted to a buxom 14 or fifteen year-old seems to be more natural, especially for other teenagers, and AIUI it's legal to have sex at that age in many countries, even as near to home as Holland and Spain.

      Comment


        #23
        If we are going to treat Kiddie fiddling as a crime then we have to use the current criminal justice system.

        If that means that some get away with it then that is the price we must pay.

        It is (and always has been) my belief that these people are mentally ill and should be treated as such under the mental health act.
        This may mean that they avoid "punishment" but they could be treated properly.

        Neither the criminal justice system not the mental health act is robust enough in this day and age.
        I am not qualified to give the above advice!

        The original point and click interface by
        Smith and Wesson.

        Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

        Comment


          #24
          It is (and always has been) my belief that these people are mentally ill and should be treated as such under the mental health act.
          Homosexuality used to be regarded as a mental illness, there are probably still some people who think of it like that. When Alan Turing was convicted in a British court in the early 1950's after admitting to his homosexual encounters, he was sentenced to hormone treatments (chemical castration?) which caused him to develop breasts. This is the sort of treatment some are now advocating for paedophiles. (In the USA they are sometimes given it, not sure if it is used here.)

          Whenever I see a witch-hunt, I want to take the side of the witch.

          I think paedophilia is analogous to homosexuality, in that it's a minority preference that is just the way some people are wired. I feel sorry for those who are wired that way, because unlike homosexuals they can't hope that changing social customs will make their sexuality acceptable. Children will never be considered capable of giving consent.

          Imagine (if you are male) what it would be like if even fantasising about adult women made you such a dangerous freak that you couldn't admit your fantasies to you best friend, and that if you actually ever shagged someone you were risking years in jail each time. Imagine living your whole life where your only realistic legal option for sex was playing with yourself (and even then it was a crime to access relevant fantasy material.)

          Before I get any predictable responses from the hard-of-thinking, I'd just like to draw their attention to the distinction that a paedophile is someone who would like to fiddle with children, not necessarily someone who actually does.

          Someone pointed out on Radio 4 this morning that not everyone who is guilty of a paedophile crime is a paedophile; someone who clicks to view an image labelled "three virgins" and gets a picture of some younger-than-expected girls has committed a crime, even if the picture is of no interest to him. This was given as an example of a "paedophile" who might be a prime candidate for receiving a caution as opposed to execution/chemical castration/a life sentence etc.
          Last edited by IR35 Avoider; 1 June 2007, 17:47.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by IR35 Avoider
            Before I get any predictable responses from the hard-of-thinking, I'd just like to draw their attention to the distinction that a paedophile is someone who would like to fiddle with children, not necessarily someone who actually does.
            Agreed. Just because I'm heterosexual and attracted to women doesn't make me a rapist, because I have self control. There seems to be this assumption that anybody who ever looks at child pornography is actively stalking children for sex as well. The argument for making child porn illegal is based on supply and demand, but there's another argument that says that porn is a harmless way of indulging your fantasy and the alternative might be more actual abuse.
            Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Troll
              If the child has passed puberty then it cannot be called paedophillia [..] I think also that paedos are not attracted to children once past puberty
              People attracted to kids past puberty used to be called pederasts, although you don't see that word used so often these days. See Wikipedia discussion
              Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by freakydancer
                I'm 30 and currently poking a 20 year old bird.

                YES!!!!
                35 poking 19

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Burdock
                  Today's Have Your Say is entitled:

                  Should some paedophiles avoid jail?


                  I've lost count of the amount of times I've seen 'castration' and 'execution' -just on the first page!


                  http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thre...20070601134153
                  Another problem is what to do with them once released

                  The probation service in Kent is trying to calm public fears after the whereabouts of a convicted paedophile were published in a national newspaper.

                  Robert Oliver, 52, is being housed in Maidstone after police had to escort him from a home in Somerset in December when a protest sprang up outside.
                  Two mothers in the town have started a petition, and written to their MP demanding Mr Oliver be re-housed.
                  Kent Probation Area said it was keen to discuss the women's concerns.
                  Mr Oliver was part of an east London paedophile gang responsible for killing 14-year-old Jason Swift in 1985. He was released from prison in 1997 after serving two-thirds of a 15-year sentence.
                  Jason was gang raped by Mr Oliver and his 'like-minded' friends and then killed, not sure these people can ever be cured, rehabilitated or considered safe
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Isn't that the good thing about 29 year olds??? ...Well, there are 20 of them.....

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Troll
                      Another problem is what to do with them once released

                      Jason was gang raped by Mr Oliver and his 'like-minded' friends and then killed, not sure these people can ever be cured, rehabilitated or considered safe
                      The fact that they are still alive shows the state of the country...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X