• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BBC Have your Say - paedophiles

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    I do have a fathers-4-justice friend who was not allowed to see his daughter from aged 4. He objected to his ex-partner's new boyfriend as a known paedophile. Described as an "aggrevated allegation" by social services(Hampshire SS are renowned as being anti men).

    His daughter was raped aged 6 - I will not forget his posting on the f4j website - I will try to dig it out later if I dont get too upset.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by andrew_neil_uk
      I do have a fathers-4-justice friend who was not allowed to see his daughter from aged 4. He objected to his ex-partner's new boyfriend as a known paedophile. Described as an "aggrevated allegation" by social services(Hampshire SS are renowned as being anti men).

      His daughter was raped aged 6 - I will not forget his posting on the f4j website - I will try to dig it out later if I dont get too upset.
      Was his daughter raped by the ex-partner's new paedophile boyfriend?

      If so and the "authorities" had prior knowledge of his past yet didn't prevent it then they are to blame and should be hung out to dry. What happened to the attacker?

      Paedophiles convicted of an actual assault should NEVER be released back into society. Also, action should be taken to increase the detection and conviction rates for these crimes as far too many get away with it for far too long.

      Slightly off topic, I was reading the latest in the Maddie story at lunchtime. It made me want to cry - those poor people and that poor little girl. The abductors, IMHO, do not deserve to live on this earth.

      Comment


        #63
        Cut their fingers and toes off, drill a hole in their heads, fill it full of maggots then bury them alive.....to start with....

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by angusglover
          Cut their fingers and toes off, drill a hole in their heads, fill it full of maggots then bury them alive.....to start with....
          What about those convicted of downloading child pornography?

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Old Greg
            What about those convicted of downloading child pornography?
            IMO, downloading it is wrong but not as wrong as carrying out some kind of attack. Maybe we should just do fingers, or toes, for these guys?

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by angusglover
              IMO, downloading it is wrong but not as wrong as carrying out some kind of attack. Maybe we should just do fingers, or toes, for these guys?
              But aren't you paying for someone else to do the attacks by proxy?

              And presumably, when you find you can store the fingers and toes until you find they're wrongly convicted and then sew them back on again? It amuses me that those that complain about Muslims are often the ones who sound like they want to live under Sharia law. Saudi Arabia should suit you alright, mate.

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Old Greg
                What about those convicted of downloading child pornography?

                And lets not forget that downloading child porn is not a victimless crime - a child had to be abused to make those images, and anyone viewing them is as guilty as if they were an actual participant.
                Life is just nature's way of keeping meat fresh

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Old Greg
                  But aren't you paying for someone else to do the attacks by proxy?

                  And presumably, when you find you can store the fingers and toes until you find they're wrongly convicted and then sew them back on again? It amuses me that those that complain about Muslims are often the ones who sound like they want to live under Sharia law. Saudi Arabia should suit you alright, mate.
                  No need to be so antagonistic. I am speaking as a father about what I would do if someone harmed my kids. Nothing at all to do with Sharia Law...or Muslims for that matter.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by WotNxt
                    Was his daughter raped by the ex-partner's new paedophile boyfriend?
                    yes

                    Originally posted by WotNxt
                    If so and the "authorities" had prior knowledge of his past yet didn't prevent it then they are to blame and should be hung out to dry. What happened to the attacker?
                    Attacker was convicted and sentenced. As for the authorities - it is impossible to sue Social Services. Theory is that they would never do anything!

                    Also Social Services are not answerable to MPs. Another friend of mine complained about SS (they refused to investigate video of his son saying his ex-wife's new partner had touched him up). SS did nothing. My friend complained to MP. MP wrote to SS. SS said "we do not have to respond to you. and we will not". That was it - a one sentence letter.

                    I wish I had never been a f4j co-ordinator.

                    Please please dont get divorced.

                    Andy

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by angusglover
                      No need to be so antagonistic. I am speaking as a father about what I would do if someone harmed my kids. Nothing at all to do with Sharia Law...or Muslims for that matter.
                      Fair enough - sorry about that - I typed it with a smile, but you wouldn't have seen that. But the chopping of of limbs and things is kind of Sharia in a way (or Medieval if you prefer). I like to think we're a bit more civilised nowadays.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X