gay parents adopt!

[Causus Deli]

Can't see what all the fuss is about...

Every day I see parents driving their kids around without child seats or even seat belts, I see parents smoking in cars with kids in, I see obese kids in McDonalds and the list could go on...

I don't think having gay parents is the ideal, but then I think there are far worse straight parents that should be bearing the brunt of this board...

As for needing a female influence...well does that mean a child should be taken off a single father?

Natural evolution and general progress is negating the need for straight couples for reproduction (artificial insemination etc) in which case it brings into question the reason that males and females would ever get together...we are different species with different wants and needs...lets face it, if it wasn't for sex most of us would choose to live with the same sex...just look at students sharing houses...

So...only the enjoyment of sex and a general mind set is keeping heterosexuality alive...the mind set will not exist in 50 years time and with sex aids/toys becoming more and more refined, virtual sex will become far more fulfilling that actual sex! And evolution has already started to set in...years ago all the guys I knew turned their nose up at anal...nowadays in general lad discussion, first question is no longer 'did she swallow?' but instead is 'did she give you a key to her back door?'...

Face it...we are a dying breed and evolution rarely gets things wrong.

Oh dear, you appear to be a person with simple needs believing the opposite sex is simply for having sex. Boy are you missing out, I suggest Kings Cross would suit. You mention smoking as if it were some heinous crime, and seat belts ffs. Perhaps when you get over the obsession with sex and breed with someone who is not there just for sex, you could find a cheap source of cotton wool to wrap the little darlinks in?

[angusglover]

EH!!!!!

SO what else are they there for???...

OOOPS!!! Silly me...I forgot the ironing and dishes....DUH!!!

[Vito]

Oh dear, you appear to be a person with simple needs believing the opposite sex is simply for having sex. Boy are you missing out, I suggest Kings Cross would suit. You mention smoking as if it were some heinous crime, and seat belts ffs. Perhaps when you get over the obsession with sex and breed with someone who is not there just for sex, you could find a cheap source of cotton wool to wrap the little darlinks in?

Ha ha

Why exactly do you come on here? You don't like it on here...you never agree with anyone...you seem to want serious debate based on proven facts or your stereotypical idealisms...I'm sure that there are places for people like you where you would be much happier...but one thing is for sure, this ain't it.

We like to have debates with a smile on our face and our tongue planted firmly in our cheeks...we like conspiracy theories and we like opinion that differ from the norm...

We don't however like people coming on here being a complete cock...so please...run along

[Vito]

Wrong ! artificial insemination means natural evolution has stopped

True in one sense...but the world is bigger than the human race

[BrilloPad]

EH!!!!!

SO what else are they there for???...

OOOPS!!! Silly me...I forgot the ironing and dishes....DUH!!!

Why does the bride wear white? Cos its the same colour as all kitchen appliances!

<runs off before SA returns>

[BrilloPad]

Ha ha

Why exactly do you come on here? You don't like it on here...you never agree with anyone...you seem to want serious debate based on proven facts or your stereotypical idealisms...I'm sure that there are places for people like you where you would be much happier...but one thing is for sure, this ain't it.

We like to have debates with a smile on our face and our tongue planted firmly in our cheeks...we like conspiracy theories and we like opinion that differ from the norm...

We don't however like people coming on here being a complete cock...so please...run along

Please dont feed the troll!

[angusglover]

[Vito]

Oh dear, you appear to be a person with simple needs believing the opposite sex is simply for having sex. Boy are you missing out, I suggest Kings Cross would suit. You mention smoking as if it were some heinous crime, and seat belts ffs. Perhaps when you get over the obsession with sex and breed with someone who is not there just for sex, you could find a cheap source of cotton wool to wrap the little darlinks in?

Forgot to say...

Have you ever seen a child killed in a road accident because their parents didn't make them wear a seat belt?

And have you ever spoken to a child with cancer caused by passive smoking?

If you have then your comments are valid...if not, then maybe they are not...and yes, I do believe that such selfish negligence is a henious crime...I don't wrap my kids in cotton wool...but I also don't do anything that knowingly could put them in any danger...I would consider this neglect at best and child abuse at worst...

You frown upon perverts who fiddle with kids (and rightly so, they should all be executed when proven guilty) but think about it...what would you rather...a child with mental scars brought on by sexual abuse...or a child that won't make it to an adult thanks to cancer or not wearing a seat belt...just answer that one honestly to yourself and then rethink your earlier response...FFS

[sasguru]

Ok Ok which one of you is Cassus Deli. He bears the same sense of unreality as Chico. LB?

[The Lone Gunman]

And if they fiddle with boys are they not gay? What statistical technique are you employing when you conclude 'vast majority', do you account for the fact that the vast majority of the population are infact not gay?

'Vast majority' As regularly reported in crime stats and from a number of discussions with the custodians of offenders (with whom I have had some contact).

You, like many ill informed people, are making the mistake of seeing kiddie fiddlers as gender determined. They do not see them as little boys and girls, just as kiddies. Some may show a preference, but it is not a 'gay' issue. It is more an issue of power over the little darlings.

Did you deliberately cross fertilize the issue to suit your own argument, or have I possibly just enlightened you?