Attn code monkeys - re: FizzBuzz

[Magnus]

Write a piece of code which prints each integer from 1 to 100 inclusively each on a separate line (use \n, vbCrLf, <br>, whatever), but if the number is divisible by 3 instead of the number print "Fizz", similary if it is divisible by 5 print "Buzz", and if it is divisible by both 3 and 5 print "FizzBuzz".

This simulates an old popular children's or drinking game.

If you decide to try this do it first, then read http://tickletux.wordpress.com/2007/...o-grok-coding/

[AtW]

Why can't it be done in assembly?

threaded.

[Churchill]

Why can't it be done in assembly?

threaded.

I hate people who answer their own questions.

[bobhope]

Things like this are interesting because they serve to confirm what you always suspect: your co-workers are idiots.

I had to do the test - couldn't resist - took under 2 minutes.

[MarillionFan]

"Things like this are interesting because they serve to confirm what you always suspect: your co-workers are idiots.

I had to do the test - couldn't resist - took under 2 minutes."

Which confirms my reasoning that people who undertake these tests are idiots. It has no commercial value to do it, benefits no-one and uses up resource but alas most techies just do it as opposed to asking the question. Why?

[SallyAnne]

"Things like this are interesting because they serve to confirm what you always suspect: your co-workers are idiots.

I had to do the test - couldn't resist - took under 2 minutes."

Which confirms my reasoning that people who undertake these tests are idiots. It has no commercial value to do it, benefits no-one and uses up resource but alas most techies just do it as opposed to asking the question. Why?

Meaning you couldn't do it

I struggled like - if I could have the values 1 - 100 stored in a table, then I would have done it in minutes with a little pl/sql function.
But faced with a SQL*Plus session alone - nah gave up after 5 mins, unless I'm allowed to change the code each time.

I must be thick

Wah

Crisps well and truly pissed on

[MarillionFan]

"Meaning you couldn't do it"

No its very easy. I just don't see why.

Far too many people do what they're told and dont see the big picture.

[Churchill]

"Meaning you couldn't do it"

No its very easy. I just don't see why.

Far too many people do what they're told and dont see the big picture.

No wonder you keep getting bounced off site.

[Spacecadet]

Far too many people do what they're told and dont see the big picture.

See my comment on the link:

Having read almost every comment on this story I’d probably sack the lot of you.
Where’s the input parameters?
Where’s the modularity?
What happens if in 6 months time the requirements change to 4 and 7 being the fizzbuzz numbers?
What happens when the program needs to be used by the french team who need le fizz le buzz?
What happens when the program is up-scaled to cover 0-1000

[MarillionFan]

and my comment