Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Information Commissioner’s Office
Collapse
X
-
During the football index scandal, basically a ponzi scheme that was given a licence by the Gambling Commission (when they had no idea how the product worked) they naturally got a lot of victims who were asking for something to be done. Many of them were banned from contacting the GC under 'unreasonable behaviour policy'. You would think it would be 'oh well they are pissed off, probably a bit aggressive', nope they were simply asking why GC doesn't do anything. -
I've actually got results from the FOS.Originally posted by CoolCat View PostFor what its worth I think the Financial Ombudsman Service is the worst of the bunch, completely incompetent and corrupt. But I am surprised that the open lack of pretence that they are even doing the basics of their job has spread as far as the ICO too. Its completely wild west out there now, with big organisations pretty much allowed to do as they please.
Tax payer is paying a lot of money for these public services which dont deliver even the basics of their remit.
Though only in my case because the companies involved were probably worried I could go public to help trash their reputations."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Comment
-
Not exactly. Poor performance can be taken into account. but it is not as simple as it should be. You need to ask previous customers for confirmation or rely on default notices which don't typically get issued unless the sh*! really hits the fan.Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View Post
Think there is a rule that prior performance can not be taken into account when evaluating current bids. Which is why no matter how tulip Crapita and G4tulip is they will continue to get new contracts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand cools in June 2026 amid UK heatwave Yesterday 08:18
- How could zero hours contract reform create unexpected problems for contractors? Jul 8 06:40
- Three Loan Charge conflicts of interest show Labour ministers knew the McCann Review was compromised from the start Jul 7 05:44
- What’s happening with HMRC off-payroll working enforcement? (IR35 update) Jul 6 08:20
- HMRC abandons PGMOL football referees case: Are contractors and IR35 hit? Jul 2 05:09
- Crypto tax and contractors: What HMRC’s new cryptoasset research really means Jul 1 04:03
- Crypto Tax and Contractors: What HMRC's New Cryptoasset Research Really Means Jul 1 04:03
- Profit and loss accounts set for public filing at Companies House from 2028 — what it means for your contractor business Jun 30 03:38
- UK IT Contractors: How to land Forward Deployed Engineer roles beyond Palantir, Anthropic and OpenAI Jun 29 05:52
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Jun 25 03:52

Comment