Originally posted by northernladuk
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Information Commissioner’s Office
Collapse
X
-
During the football index scandal, basically a ponzi scheme that was given a licence by the Gambling Commission (when they had no idea how the product worked) they naturally got a lot of victims who were asking for something to be done. Many of them were banned from contacting the GC under 'unreasonable behaviour policy'. You would think it would be 'oh well they are pissed off, probably a bit aggressive', nope they were simply asking why GC doesn't do anything. -
I've actually got results from the FOS.Originally posted by CoolCat View PostFor what its worth I think the Financial Ombudsman Service is the worst of the bunch, completely incompetent and corrupt. But I am surprised that the open lack of pretence that they are even doing the basics of their job has spread as far as the ICO too. Its completely wild west out there now, with big organisations pretty much allowed to do as they please.
Tax payer is paying a lot of money for these public services which dont deliver even the basics of their remit.
Though only in my case because the companies involved were probably worried I could go public to help trash their reputations."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Comment
-
Not exactly. Poor performance can be taken into account. but it is not as simple as it should be. You need to ask previous customers for confirmation or rely on default notices which don't typically get issued unless the sh*! really hits the fan.Originally posted by JustKeepSwimming View Post
Think there is a rule that prior performance can not be taken into account when evaluating current bids. Which is why no matter how tulip Crapita and G4tulip is they will continue to get new contracts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who the hell is Ethica Resolve — and is it ethical? Sep 4 10:42
- Contractor limited company pension contributions: how to extract profit tax-efficiently? Sep 4 07:44
- The weird, the wonderful and the genuinely useful: what contractors get wrong about expenses Sep 3 06:00
- Right to Work changes from October 2026: a contractor’s explainer Sep 2 15:46
- Data Kraken v Torry Harris: 5 lessons for software developer contractors Sep 2 06:09
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Sep 1 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27

Comment