Originally posted by tim123
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Has Futuro Gone Bust?
Collapse
X
-
really? - they will get enough to cover their fees and do it asap to get their hands on it. This will be called "the need to stop the assets(i.e. contractors) walking" -
I reckon it will be speed rather than value, most of the big sites have already moved their contracts to another agency so unless they do it quick there will be none to sell! Depends whether the administrators have the sense to see that, their loyalty is to the factoring company who brought them in tho' so anything is possible.
If they do sell them back to the Directors then I reckon any client with any sense will use whatever clause they can to terminate immediately before the same thing happens again!
Cheers
WindComment
-
Yep, that is the point. If they were buildings, selling then one by one nets the best return.Originally posted by WindyAnnaI reckon it will be speed rather than value, most of the big sites have already moved their contracts to another agency so unless they do it quick there will be none to sell!
But these are time limited contracts. Selling individually takes a lot of time and each day less on the contract makes it worth less money. The best return is going to be achieved by selling them in large bundles very quickly
timComment
-
Last time there was a problem with an agency going under some contractors phoned up the Administrator and bought out their contracts dirt cheap from them and then got the agency cut as well.Comment
-
Futuro now in Liquidation
They've paid off the finance company (GE), they will pay the administrators, they should be able to pay the preferential creditors (the employees redundancy which comes from the state anyway!) and then "it is uncertain whether there will be sufficient realisations to enable a distribution to the non-preferential creditors of the company". since one of the non-pref creditors is HMRC (£312,671) it is likely that if tehre is owt to be had they will be the ones to have it!
I never expected to see any of this money (and if any of it does become available, in my case it will go to the Prosperity4 administrators - LOL) but the whole document just makes depressing reading except for this bit which really made me chortle ..
"There remains a significant number of outstanding timesheets which the Joint Administrators have to date not received from the contractors despite repeated chasing . The Joint Liquidators propose to continue to pursue this matter in the Compulsory Liquidation"
Oooh you naughty contractors - not submitting timesheets for money you will never see .... !!
WindyComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Today 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Yesterday 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44

Comment