• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

A case for the death penalty?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Castrate them..!!!!
    Choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by oloks
      Castrate them..!!!!
      They can still get errections
      The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

      But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by Bagpuss
        One thing that is disgracefull about our legal system is had he not killed the girl he would have been out in 18 months. Had he robbed a post office he'd be looking at 5-10. Money is more important then life in the eyes of the law.
        That is and always has been the case. Dates back to the times when life was cheap, it was property and chattels that had value so crimes against them were the most harshly punished.

        Myself, I am against the death penalty for anyone, no matter how heinous the crime.
        I'm Spartacus.

        Comment


          #54
          Or better still use them for lab testings instead of chimps and rats...since they are lower than animals....
          Choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Spartacus
            That is and always has been the case. Dates back to the times when life was cheap, it was property and chattels that had value so crimes against them were the most harshly punished.

            Myself, I am against the death penalty for anyone, no matter how heinous the crime.
            Let's have some sense in the law though. Money is cheap, life, or ruining someones life is not. Rob a post office (without violence) should be a lower sentence than child abuse or any sort of physical assault aginst the person.
            The court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.

            But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Bagpuss
              Let's have some sense in the law though. Money is cheap, life, or ruining someones life is not. Rob a post office (without violence) should be a lower sentence than child abuse or any sort of physical assault aginst the person.
              But the law isn't constructed historically or now in terms of the effect of the crime on an individual, but on its effect on the state, "society" if you will. In such a system the effect of robbing a post office is greater than the effect of ruining someone's life.

              Not saying this is "right", but that is how law the (western) world over works. It's not about vengeance or wrong-righting at the individual level.
              I'm Spartacus.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by SallyAnne

                Men and young lads in prison now, would have more than likely gone into ship building or mining straight from school. Instead, them (like their dads/uncles/brothers) haven't really got a lot, turn to crime, yadda yadda yawn.
                So you think the government at the time should have subsidised those industries which were essentially economically unviable - and if they had done so, then these people you talk of would not have turned to crime?


                Bogeyman - the tories stuck the DVLA in Wales to create jobs.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by zeitghost
                  Fondly known as the brothel on the hill...
                  Do tell.............

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Crime in Britain

                    The cases you have highlighted are terrible, but if you look at other countries who have harsher punishments like China and singapore their crime rates are very low in comparrison. China still has the death penalty as do many other countries. The problem is for justice to be done it has to be perceived to be done not only by the individuals who are affected but by the masses aswell to discourage them from doing similar acts.
                    So called petty crime is on the increase especially by teenagers who know they can't be touched, and what will they get up to when they are older. I say clamp down on all criminals and make justice swift. If that means bringing back the death penalty then so be it.
                    I say bring back corporal punishment for young offenders like in Singapore and see if the crime rate drops then....
                    It cost approxiamately £200K per year to incarcerate someone no wonder we are all paying lots of taxes.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by interested
                      the tories stuck the DVLA in Wales to create jobs.
                      It has always puzzled me how moving an office, with its employees, is called "creating jobs".

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X