Originally posted by Denny
Does global warming mean the end to ice cream as we know it? 
-
Global warming means as soon as you buy the icecream and start eating it , it will be melting in your hands -
I'm staggered that 11 people here (currently) have such a tenuous grip on reality that they think global warming has nothing to do with human activities.
I thought that the average iq here, and grasp of basic scientific principles was a bit better than that - oh well
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Bogey mate, I am one of those 11 and the question is about "primarily".Originally posted by bogeymanI'm staggered that 11 people here (currently) have such a tenuous grip on reality that they think global warming has nothing to do with human activities.
I thought that the average iq here, and grasp of basic scientific principles was a bit better than that - oh well
I would suggest that human activity is a factor, but I do not believe that it is the major contributing factor. I see this "global warming" or "climate change" as scurilous scare mongering to drum up support for research or as an excuse for taxation etc.
I have reasons for my beliefs, but it would take too long to explain here.I am not qualified to give the above advice!
The original point and click interface by
Smith and Wesson.
Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to timeComment
-
Read the fekin' papers on the subject.Originally posted by zeitghost
It's all very well arguing from a point of complete feckin ignorance.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Don't believe everything you read in the papers!Originally posted by bogeyman
Comment
-
I believe that human activity is responsible for 30% of global warming
Dont ask me how I got that figureComment
-
I think there is a failure to untangle the spurious tax argument from the scientific concept. Just because opportunists like Brown et al see it as a cash cow doesn't equate to the argument being eronious. The other problem is those spreading propoganda to support the status quo. If we untangle the spin it still seems to me we should do something (if we can). We have the technology to adapt, why can't we do that? Why do we have to maintain the status quo, ask yourself who wants to maintain it?Originally posted by bogeymanThe court heard Darren Upton had written a letter to Judge Sally Cahill QC saying he wasn’t “a typical inmate of prison”.
But the judge said: “That simply demonstrates your arrogance continues. You are typical. Inmates of prison are people who are dishonest. You are a thoroughly dishonestly man motivated by your own selfish greed.”Comment
-
What I can't understand is how come it was warmer 2000 years ago????
Then it was fecking cold in the 14 centurys and now it's starting to get warm again ???But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the youngerComment
-
I think thats popostorous! Surely any half wit can see it's clearly, 27.6654% !Originally posted by andy
I don't know how you people tie your shoelaces in the morning
Comment
-
If I was "strangely single", which I'm not, why would that invalidate any logical or scientific argument I might have? Keep digging ...Originally posted by Lucy
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
Comment