You say it’s the same money but haven’t factored in travel costs, regardless of how the contract sits. Hint: it’s not the same money.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contract dilemma.
Collapse
X
-
-
the OP said 'same rate' not 'same money'.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostYou say it’s the same money but haven’t factored in travel costs, regardless of how the contract sits. Hint: it’s not the same money.Comment
-
What were you expecting the payment in, thermos flasks?Originally posted by BR14 View Postthe OP said 'same rate' not 'same money'.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
It's point of semantics, true, but IMO the rate is what is paid to your LtdCo and the money is what is made from the gig.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostWhat were you expecting the payment in, thermos flasks?Comment
-
Okay if that is what BR14 is getting at. Money for me, when you’re thinking as a limited company director, is the bottom line profit for that gig, i.e. its revenue less its costs.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt's point of semantics, true, but IMO the rate is what is paid to your LtdCo and the money is what is made from the gig.
How profitable is that contract to the limited company compared to the other one on offer? If the revenue is the same and so is the duration, then it is the one with the lowest costs.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Well given one has travel costs and the others 100% from home, as both pay the same daily rate the WFH contract generates a high gross profit compared to the one that has travel costs.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostOkay if that is what BR14 is getting at. Money for me, when you’re thinking as a limited company director, is the bottom line profit for that gig, i.e. its revenue less its costs.
How profitable is that contract to the limited company compared to the other one on offer? If the revenue is the same and so is the duration, then it is the one with the lowest costs.
Downside is that the WFH sounds boring as hell but I don't think it matters as the other contract is just more interesting rather than a new skillset.
I would take the WFH contract.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
-
I thought OP was the older generation so choices are
Better looking contract on paper and possible death by Covid by visiting office every day
Or stay at home
No brainer
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment