You say it’s the same money but haven’t factored in travel costs, regardless of how the contract sits. Hint: it’s not the same money.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contract dilemma.
Collapse
X
-
-
the OP said 'same rate' not 'same money'.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostYou say it’s the same money but haven’t factored in travel costs, regardless of how the contract sits. Hint: it’s not the same money.Comment
-
What were you expecting the payment in, thermos flasks?Originally posted by BR14 View Postthe OP said 'same rate' not 'same money'.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
It's point of semantics, true, but IMO the rate is what is paid to your LtdCo and the money is what is made from the gig.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostWhat were you expecting the payment in, thermos flasks?Comment
-
Okay if that is what BR14 is getting at. Money for me, when you’re thinking as a limited company director, is the bottom line profit for that gig, i.e. its revenue less its costs.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostIt's point of semantics, true, but IMO the rate is what is paid to your LtdCo and the money is what is made from the gig.
How profitable is that contract to the limited company compared to the other one on offer? If the revenue is the same and so is the duration, then it is the one with the lowest costs.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Well given one has travel costs and the others 100% from home, as both pay the same daily rate the WFH contract generates a high gross profit compared to the one that has travel costs.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostOkay if that is what BR14 is getting at. Money for me, when you’re thinking as a limited company director, is the bottom line profit for that gig, i.e. its revenue less its costs.
How profitable is that contract to the limited company compared to the other one on offer? If the revenue is the same and so is the duration, then it is the one with the lowest costs.
Downside is that the WFH sounds boring as hell but I don't think it matters as the other contract is just more interesting rather than a new skillset.
I would take the WFH contract.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
-
I thought OP was the older generation so choices are
Better looking contract on paper and possible death by Covid by visiting office every day
Or stay at home
No brainer
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment