Interesting and Alternative Covid Perspective.

[AtW]

Anyway, now you are saying the Spectator is disreputable. Curious why you say that?

With writers like that reputation is optional

https://www.spectator.co.uk/writer/boris-johnson

[woohoo]

With writers like that reputation is optional

https://www.spectator.co.uk/writer/boris-johnson

It has several writers with different opinions for example, https://www.spectator.co.uk/podcast/...-nandy-edition

I think Andrew Neil is on the board (he does say he doesn't control content though), he has been known to give Boris a bad old time.

Andrew Neil challenges Johnson to commit to interview: 'It is not too late' - YouTube

You might remember the empty chair interview.

So again, why is the Spectator a dodgy source of info, i really do want to know why?

[darmstadt]

However Cummings wife is a commissioning editor

It has several writers with different opinions for example, https://www.spectator.co.uk/podcast/...-nandy-edition

I think Andrew Neil is on the board (he does say he doesn't control content though), he has been known to give Boris a bad old time.

Andrew Neil challenges Johnson to commit to interview: 'It is not too late' - YouTube

You might remember the empty chair interview.

So again, why is the Spectator a dodgy source of info, i really do want to know why?

Sent from my 5g carrier pigeon

[Jog On]

Meanwhile....

Russia receives orders from 20 countries for ONE BILLION doses of world’s first Covid-19 vaccine — RT Russia News

[woohoo]

However Cummings wife is a commissioning editor

Sent from my 5g carrier pigeon

Are you suggesting that his Wife can't have an independent thought of her own?

[Jog On]

Oh and:

WHO Vows To "Review" Russian COVID-19 Vaccine, Top US Scientist Slams Putin's "Reckless" Move | Zero Hedge

In a battle of fake news vs fake news who wins?

[TheGreenBastard]

Are you suggesting that his Wife can't have an independent thought of her own?

Indeed, Bolshevistic "guilt by association" seems very popular on this forum.

[AtW]

So again, why is the Spectator a dodgy source of info, i really do want to know why?

Why?

Because that's how they make money (via influence) - being a right wing partisan propaganda tool, owners are the same chaps who own ToryGraph:

"The Spectator is a weekly British magazine on politics, culture, and current affairs. It was first published in July 1828, thus making it the oldest weekly magazine in the world. It is owned by David and Frederick Barclay, who also own The Daily Telegraph newspaper, via Press Holdings."

Same tulip is generated non-stop on ToryGraph, the only reason I pay for it is to read occasional leaks that they get

[Jog On]

I for one would like to be told what the acceptable sources of information are. In fact a list of acceptable and unacceptable would be great - thanks.

[woohoo]

Why?

Because that's how they make money (via influence) - being a right wing partisan propaganda tool, owners are the same chaps who own ToryGraph:

"The Spectator is a weekly British magazine on politics, culture, and current affairs. It was first published in July 1828, thus making it the oldest weekly magazine in the world. It is owned by David and Frederick Barclay, who also own The Daily Telegraph newspaper, via Press Holdings."

Same tulip is generated non-stop on ToryGraph, the only reason I pay for it is to read occasional leaks that they get

Oh I see, because it doesn't fit into your world view and leanings. Fair enough, at least you are honest about it.