Originally posted by rogerfederer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Which trading platform?
Collapse
X
-
I'm not convinced about the pivot away from China, the company I work for is increasing its business with China because the rest of the world is in lock down. Over the next year or two it will be all about survival, there will be no money to build factories for new supply chains, and companies will buy from the cheapest supplier. However I agree that it will be discussed extensively on chat shows, radio shows and in the newspapers.I'm alright Jack -
A company I'm doing work for is also seeing China as a huge growth area. Nothing to do with manufacturing, more on the pharmaceutical side.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostI'm not convinced about the pivot away from China, the company I work for is increasing its business with China because the rest of the world is in lock down. Over the next year or two it will be all about survival, there will be no money to build factories for new supply chains, and companies will buy from the cheapest supplier. However I agree that it will be discussed extensively on chat shows, radio shows and in the newspapers.Comment
-
In the end reality prevails. Still and this is the important point, the discussion about it makes for good ratings and helps to sell newspapers.Originally posted by ladymuck View PostA company I'm doing work for is also seeing China as a huge growth area. Nothing to do with manufacturing, more on the pharmaceutical side.I'm alright JackComment
-
I suspect we'll see raised barriers from the US, of which the UK follow suit. It does make more sense to concentrate on India and Brazil than China, given the authoritarian and oppressive tendencies of the latter. I don't like the altright wing narrative in general but unfortunately they've latched on to the hypocrisy that is a fair point: we've allowed a communist-authoritarian-dictatorship hybrid to flourish to such an extent whilst ignoring morals, when other countries not far away (India, for example) are there and offer just as much opportunity as China.Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIn the end reality prevails. Still and this is the important point, the discussion about it makes for good ratings and helps to sell newspapers.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment