Oh Dear: Facebook bans 'dangerous individuals'

[AtW]

Facebook bans 'dangerous individuals' - BBC News

RT should start their own socia network

[TwoWolves]

Paul Watson is a bit mild for a banning. This is not a good look for FB.

[Jog On]

Facebook bans 'dangerous individuals' - BBC News

RT should start their own socia network

This kind of thing might be OK where you come from but we like free speech over here.

[original PM]

And who gets to decide who is a dangerous individual?

Ah yes it is those people who disagree with their views and want you to believe something else.

We are ok - sadly the generations following us are fooked.

[meridian]

And who gets to decide who is a dangerous individual?

Ah yes it is those people who disagree with their views and want you to believe something else.

We are ok - sadly the generations following us are fooked.

If you believe that you haven’t been influenced by any form of media that wants you to believe something else, then they’ve done a good job....

[Jog On]

Nice to see the BBC celebrating world press freedom day.

Courtney Radsch, from the Committee to Protect Journalists, says anti-press rhetoric has become endemic in many countries, pointing in particular to the Philippines and the US.

She believes social media and the internet have added to the issues journalists face.

"Online harassment and its very real threats to journalists, especially women, has compounded the already challenging environment," she says.

Better shut down all unofficial voices that challenge the MSM narrative and make it illegal while we're at it.

[meridian]

Nice to see the BBC celebrating world press freedom day.



Better shut down all unofficial voices that challenge the MSM narrative and make it illegal while we're at it.

Or how about the incels just stop being jerks towards women?

[Jog On]

Or how about the incels just stop being jerks towards women?

Or how about people disagreeing with MSM narrative stop reading alternate sources and calling out MSM journalists on their social media? have you noticed how few articles on the BBC allow comments now and the ones that do are around fairly drab subjects and not particularly contentious?

They used to blame all the negative comments on Russian trolls but bow they've just shut down commenting. However if you read a BBC article that doesn't allow comments then go to the author's twitter feed you'll see the problem they face.:

Dave Lee on Twitter: "New from me: Facebook moves to ban 'dangerous' individuals. Goes into a little depth on the apparent rationale. Backlash will surely come at any moment now. https://t.co/vv0wa0iSjQ"

Are those incels commenting on this tweet?

[Old Greg]

And who gets to decide who is a dangerous individual?

Facebook.

HTH

[meridian]

Or how about people disagreeing with MSM narrative stop reading alternate sources and calling out MSM journalists on their social media? have you noticed how few articles on the BBC allow comments now and the ones that do are around fairly drab subjects and not particularly contentious?

They used to blame all the negative comments on Russian trolls but bow they've just shut down commenting. However if you read a BBC article that doesn't allow comments then go to the author's twitter feed you'll see the problem they face.:

Dave Lee on Twitter: "New from me: Facebook moves to ban 'dangerous' individuals. Goes into a little depth on the apparent rationale. Backlash will surely come at any moment now. https://t.co/vv0wa0iSjQ"

Are those incels commenting on this tweet?

Yes.

HTH.