Originally posted by Bean
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Corbyn resigns
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
What %-tage of Palestinians would have destroyed Israel if they could? I reckon 95%, most likely closer to 99.9%. -
“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Saudi Arabia got no nukes, if they had them I am pretty certain they would not have used them on Israel, their main beef is with Iran.Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostOh Dear. You're a Remainer aren't you?


Comment
-
You should've told him to Google it!Originally posted by shaunbhoy View PostOh Dear. You're a Remainer aren't you?


Comment
-
Which country's innocent citizens does a UK PM need to support killing?Originally posted by Eirikur View PostHe supports the guys that kill innocent Israeli citizen, such an idiot cannot be allowed to become pm of the UKOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
IIRC...........that'd be Iraq!Originally posted by d000hg View PostWhich country's innocent citizens does a UK PM need to support killing?

“The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”Comment
-
Quick, wet the bed v2.0
More stuff outside your control
Seriously AtW, what is the point in asking the question, if, when presented with the views of 1 of the groups you are hypothesising about (Fatah), you ignore them and form a radically different conclusion?
Ps. I love the way you don't even google KSA before asking what it/they are.....and you are 1 of many with the audacity to call others stupid?
Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
"Fatah has, since its inception, created, led or sponsored a number of armed groups and militias, some of which have had an official standing as the movement's armed wing, and some of which have not been publicly or even internally recognized as such. The group has also dominated various PLO and Palestinian Authority forces and security services which were/are not officially tied to Fatah, but in practice have served as wholly pro-Fatah armed units, and been staffed largely by members. The original name for Fatah's armed wing was al-'Asifah ("The Storm"), and this was also the name Fatah first used in its communiques, trying for some time to conceal its identity. This name has since been applied more generally to Fatah armed forces, and does not correspond to a single unit today. Other militant groups associated with Fatah include:Originally posted by Bean View PostSeriously AtW, what is the point in asking the question, if, when presented with the views of 1 of the groups you are hypothesising about (Fatah), you ignore them and form a radically different conclusion?
Force 17. Plays a role akin to the Presidential Guard for senior Fatah leaders.[citation needed] Created by Yasser Arafat.
Black September Organization. A group formed by leading Fatah members in 1971, following the events of the "Black September" in Jordan, to organize clandestine attacks with which Fatah did not want to be openly associated. These included strikes against leading Jordanian politicians as a means of exacting vengeance and raising the price for attacking the Palestinian movement; and also, most controversially, for "international operations" (e.g. the Munich Olympics massacre), intended to put pressure on the US, Europe and Israel, to raise the visibility of the Palestinian cause and to upstage radical rivals such as the PFLP. Fatah publicly disassociated itself from the group, but it is widely believed that it enjoyed Arafat's direct or tacit backing. It was discontinued in 1973–1974, as Fatah's political line shifted again, and the Black September operations and the strategy behind them were seen as having become a political liability, rather than an asset.
Fatah Hawks. An armed militia active mainly until the mid-1990s.
Tanzim. A branch of Fatah under the leadership of Marwan Barghouti, with roots in the activism of the First Intifada, which carried out armed attacks in the early days of the Second Intifada. It was later subsumed or sidelined by the al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades. Created during the Second Intifada to bolster the organization's militant standing vis-à-vis the rival Hamas movement, which had taken the lead in attacks on Israel after 1993, and was gaining rapidly in popularity with the advent of the Intifada. The Brigades are locally organized and have been said to suffer from poor cohesion and internal discipline, at times ignoring ceasefires and other initiatives announced by the central Fatah leadership. They are generally seen as tied to the "young guard" of Fatah politics, organizing young members on the street level, but it is not clear that they form a faction in themselves inside Fatah politics; rather, different Brigades units may be tied to different Fatah factional leaders."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah
Yeah, those guys won't nuke Israel if they couldComment
-
Your prejudice & bigotry is disgusting; suffice to say, I disagree with your assertion.Originally posted by AtW View PostWhat %-tage of Palestinians would have destroyed Israel if they could? I reckon 95%, most likely closer to 99.9%.Originally posted by Old GregI admit I'm just a lazy, lying cretinous hypocrite and must be going deaf♕Keep calm & carry on♕Comment
-
What %-tage you think then, 48% or 52%?Originally posted by Bean View PostYour prejudice & bigotry is disgusting; suffice to say, I disagree with your assertion.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment