- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cash in hand payments could be banned
Collapse
X
-
-
Just saw this and I'm thinking 'How'?Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View Post
And isn't cash in hand already illegal (and therefor banned)?"Is someone you don't like allowed to say something you don't like? If that is the case then we have free speech."- Elon Musk -
How is it illegal?Originally posted by Jog On View PostJust saw this and I'm thinking 'How'?
And isn't cash in hand already illegal (and therefor banned)?
Nothing illegal about paying a tradesman in cash. Whether or not he puts it through his books and pays tax on it is another matter..
Nothing to see here, move along.Do what thou wiltComment
-
Can't argue with that.The amount tradespeople avoid in tax, is a drop in the ocean, compared to big companies avoiding the tax that they owe. Once again, chase the little man, and let the giant get away wit it.
Individuals are easier targets for government than the organisations that control them."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Cash payments are legal, "cash in hand" was defined thusly when I searched and this is the normal definition:Originally posted by Dark Black View PostHow is it illegal?
Nothing illegal about paying a tradesman in cash. Whether or not he puts it through his books and pays tax on it is another matter..
Nothing to see here, move along.payment for goods and services in cash rather than by cheque or other means, typically as a way of avoiding the payment of tax on the amount earned.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
-
Quite. My mother (about to be 80 and now with arthritis) employs a gardener once a month, to whom she pays cash. She could write him a cheque, but since they live in the country, and there isn't a bank for a dozen miles, that isn't practical. She could do an online transfer, but she doesn't trust the internet so she would never touch online banking. He could take card payments, but that involves massive bank charges, and quite large 4G charges as well, in order to operate the payment machines, and there isn't a very good 4G signal in deepest Devon anyway. Only a complete moron would try and ban cash payments, because cash is the only payment form which doesn't cost either the payer or the payee any additional money. And best of luck enforcing it. Herding cats would be easier...Originally posted by Dark Black View PostHow is it illegal?
Nothing illegal about paying a tradesman in cash. Whether or not he puts it through his books and pays tax on it is another matter..
Nothing to see here, move along.His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
It is an interesting thing to discuss.
So lets say as a plumber I work 40 hours a week and all that I do is properly catered for from a tax/ni perspective etc - in essence I am clean.
Then at the weekend I am happy to help friends and friends of friends with some of their own plumbing diy projects and in return they are happy to give me a gift - which may be £100 and a box of chocolates...
If in the second instance there is no contract then.....
Obviously when the pikeys try and do your drive and insist on cash you know that is dodgy.Comment
-
I make a point of paying tradesmen in cash because I know they are going to dodge the tax.
If it's someone I know (usually the case) they have given me mates rates anyway so I'm saving too and if it's not then I offer to pay cash if they'll charge me less as I know they'll not put it through the books.
If it's good enough for Starbucks, Costa, Amazon, Philip May, etc...Comment
-
And then you complain they put tax rates up for contractors to compensate...
Banks can already track everything you do so you'd think these days, they could easily spot suspicious patterns like Mr. Plumber makes numerous cash deposits to his personal account. In fact you already sometimes get asked "where did this cash come from" in certain circumstances.
They could enact a law specifying a maximum cash payment, or have the law only apply to trading entities, I suppose. This would mean you gran paying her gardener isn't affected - he is unlikely to be earning enough to have much tax to evade anyway.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment