Listening to comments about this on LBC.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Trade war begins
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by TwoWolves View PostWhat do you think the Customs Union is?
This isn't specifically what the US administration is focussing on, however. It's the abuse of NAFTA, both China and the EU ship components to Mexico and Canada for assembly and then sell the finished goods in the US under the NAFTA agreement. This circumvents trade agreements in place for direct trade. That's the current beef.
Not blocking Russia though. Funny, that...
http://amp.nymag.com/daily/intellige...al-giant.html?
“RUSAL has felt the impact of U.S. sanctions because of its entanglement with Oleg Deripaska, but the U.S. government is not targeting the hardworking people who depend on RUSAL and its subsidiaries,”Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostListening to comments about this on LBC.
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostDO share ....
I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostIt is indeed very interesting, not to mention amusing, how the rise of the cretinocracy in the Anglo-Saxon countries (US and UK) is going to hasten their loss of influence and power.
What is also interesting is how the right now embrace naive socialist ideas like protectionism, simply because they want the votes of the uncompetitive cretinocracy.
If protectionsim worked, North Korea would be the most successful state in the world.Comment
-
There is some evidence that protectionism works in the initial stages of a country's development, when keeping out foreign competition may help indigenous industry to take root.
After that period in a country's development though, the evidence is overwhelming that it doesn't work, making everyone poorer.
Tariffs are a tax and eventually the consumer pays.
Look at the US - put tariffs on steel and aluminium - initially there might be some local investment in those industries, but the lack of competition means in the long run costs will go up and quality will go down (competition keeps you on your toes), companies who use these raw products will have to raise their prices, US products will become uncompetitive.
Or say the US puts punitive tariffs on German luxury cars into the US - US cars which are tulipe, but have to be a certain standard purely because they can be compared to German cars,
will become even more tulipe.
The thing is developed economies end up specialising in certain areas because they have cultural inclinations and aptitudes in those areas. Trying to create jobs in low value-added industries which are being mechanised anyway, simply because those are the people who voted for you, is doomed to failure.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
You only have to spend 10 minutes listening to LBC to know the UK is going to hell in a hand cart.
Personally I blame tabloid newspapers after years of shoving their tripe down people's throats.
I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostThere is some evidence that protectionism works in the initial stages of a country's development, when keeping out foreign competition may help indigenous industry to take root.
After that period in a country's development though, the evidence is overwhelming that it doesn't work, making everyone poorer.
Tariffs are a tax and eventually the consumer pays.
Look at the US - put tariffs on steel and aluminium - initially there might be some local investment in those industries, but the lack of competition means in the long run costs will go up and quality will go down (competition keeps you on your toes), companies who use these raw products will have to raise their prices, US products will become uncompetitive.
Or say the US puts punitive tariffs on German luxury cars into the US - US cars which are tulipe, but have to be a certain standard purely because they can be compared to German cars,
will become even more tulipe.
The thing is developed economies end up specialising in certain areas because they have cultural inclinations and aptitudes in those areas. Trying to create jobs in low value-added industries which are being mechanised anyway, simply because those are the people who voted for you, is doomed to failure.
I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by ContractorOnAMotorbike View PostYou're using an extreme example to claim that protectionism doesn't work. Here's a less extreme example... Take a look at the motorcycle industry in India. The Indian government permitted collaboration so long as the major shareholder was an indian entity and banned chinese manufacturers outright. The end result was that you now have top japanese companies like Honda, Yamaha etc and top european companies like BMW, KTM and so on working with indian manufacturers like Bajaj and TVS churning out thousands of quality bikes for the local market and motorbikes for export. Protectionism does work if it is done right.
Compare the build quality of an Indian Enfield, say, with a Honda.
Like I say, protectionism works in the early stages.
Now if India wants quality products it's going to have to learn to comepete with Honda and the like.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostIndian bikes are not quality bikes.
Compare the build quality of an Indian Enfield, say, with a Honda.
Like I say, protectionism works in the early stages.
Now if India wants quality products it's going to have to learn to comepete with Honda and the like.
Bear in mind that India has its own problems! Namely a looming water shortage when the populous eventually learns to use a toilet and not crap in the street!Old Greg - In search of acceptance since Mar 2007. Hoping each leap will be his last.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment