Originally posted by fatboyslim
View Post
One is sharp business practice, one is marginally evasive and one is good commercial sense. Sadly HMG treats all three the same, when only two of them need fixing.
It is too simplistic to say a contractor with a long term gig is taking an "unfair" advantage; his risks do not change, he still need to manage his income as best he can to cover those risks and he does not gain any rights or benefits, so why should he be victimised by the tax system?
Comment