- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
This is a level beyond taking the piss.....
Collapse
X
-
-
Tampons and Towels are a luxury.
You can use a sanitary belt and reusable sanitary napkins...
apparently -
Originally posted by Wilmslow View Post
One of our friends in Brighton owns that company.
Yep, she has made quite a few quid out of the idea, which is a bloody good one IMO.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Yes well done....Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostOne of our friends in Brighton owns that company.
Yep, she has made quite a few quid out of the idea, which is a bloody good one IMO.
Comment
-
Although I appreciate that these are necessities rather than luxury items, £100 over a lifetime doesn't seem to be that much to get worked up over?In your lifetime you might spend £1,499.74 on products, £97.77 of which is on VAT.Comment
-
Apparently, the only reason they are not zero-rated is because in the 1970s when joining the EEC the government had to decide products should have vat added. At the time tampons where not considered a necessity.Comment
-
Man I was enjoying a coffee before opening this thread."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Probably because the civil servants and ministers around at the time didn't know what they were due to the way they were educated.Originally posted by woohoo View PostApparently, the only reason they are not zero-rated is because in the 1970s when joining the EEC the government had to decide products should have vat added. At the time tampons where not considered a necessity."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
The issue isn't women who can afford them it is the girls and women who can't.Originally posted by meridian View PostAlthough I appreciate that these are necessities rather than luxury items, £100 over a lifetime doesn't seem to be that much to get worked up over?
Food banks and homeless shelters actually ask for sanitary products due to the cost.
Oh and the estimate is completely wrong for some woman like me."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
And they were correct.Originally posted by woohoo View PostApparently, the only reason they are not zero-rated is because in the 1970s when joining the EEC the government had to decide products should have vat added. At the time tampons where not considered a necessity.
But it's a bit like saying bog roll is not a necessity as you can use your hand and then wash it.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment