Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
November Budget - Stop Public sector IR35 rules coming into the Private sector
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
So we should all complete the consultation and ask for the Taylor report recommendations to be implemented and nothing else. That would mean we can easily be exempt though we would need to pick our words carefully to help ensure it happens. -
Cheers dude, that's gone into my thick skull now.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostEdited for clarity (I hope)
Leave a comment:
-
Edited for clarity (I hope)Originally posted by Guesstimator View PostNot being nitpicky and I get the gist but it's a bit ...confusing...Leave a comment:
-
ISTR something wrt to expenses in that it was an AND rather than an OR of all three to be eligible to claim.Originally posted by Swamp Thing View PostHMRC must prove all three are present.
I guess that was one of their lame proposals that bit the dust.Leave a comment:
-
Not being nitpicky and I get the gist but it's a bit ...confusing...Originally posted by Swamp Thing View PostHMRC must prove all three are present.
I'm being dense, that's all.Last edited by Guesstimator; 21 November 2017, 10:28.Leave a comment:
-
HMRC must prove all three are present.Originally posted by Guesstimator View PostForgive me, struggling to get my head around that...is it worded correctly?Leave a comment:
-
Forgive me, struggling to get my head around that...is it worded correctly?Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
As long as you can prove one of the three criteria is absent (lack of SDC, lack of MoO, presence of RoS) then you are outside. HMRC must prove all three.
ETA, I mean I'm being thickLast edited by Guesstimator; 21 November 2017, 10:22.Leave a comment:
-
No, they have not.Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View PostSorry if I'm missing something here but have they redefined the rules surrounding IR35?
As long as you can prove one of the three criteria is absent (ie you can prove a lack of SDC OR lack of MoO OR presence of RoS) then you are outside. HMRC must prove all three (ie you do not have an RoS AND you have MoO AND you are subject to SDC).Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View PostI thought if you could prove anyone of the 3 criteria (MOO etc) you were outside. Not the reverse of that.Last edited by TheFaQQer; 21 November 2017, 10:26.Leave a comment:
-
Sorry if I'm missing something here but have they redefined the rules surrounding IR35?Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostAnd that HMRC have admitted does not even check for one of the three pillars of employment, it just assumes that it is always there.
I thought if you could prove anyone of the 3 criteria (MOO etc) you were outside. Not the reverse of that.Leave a comment:
-
And that HMRC have admitted does not even check for one of the three pillars of employment, it just assumes that it is always there.Originally posted by NigelJK View PostWorth pointing out that CEST was late (and unfinished) due the fact that the Contractors working on it down tools and left.Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: