The best thing of being inside IR35 is that we can get normal mortgages again
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
November Budget - Stop Public sector IR35 rules coming into the Private sector
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by mattfx View PostThat would be extremely unfair - you cannot have an organisation deem you to be out and then retrospectively in. I doubt that'd hold water in court.
That's why I keep a record of everything that points away from my being a disguised employee.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostNever understood the problem of being a contractor with a client for a number of years. I know many companies that have long standing relationships with client, suppliers etc. Obviously, if they act like an employee then that's different but not sure why the number of years has anything to do with it.
However in conjunction with the other examples I have mentioned it would be another factor.
I know, for a fact, it would be mentioned in the case of an HMRC IR35 investigation.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostNever understood the problem of being a contractor with a client for a number of years. I know many companies that have long standing relationships with client, suppliers etc. Obviously, if they act like an employee then that's different but not sure why the number of years has anything to do with it.
I work when I want, where I want, using my own equipment - today I'm lying in bed in Nottingham because I was away yesterday and not home until tomorrow. I've worked in different places and at different times to suit my availability.
The fact that I've done so for years doesn't impact my IR35 status at all.Comment
-
Comment
-
indeed
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostNot if you haven't been in the same contract for two or three years!Comment
-
Originally posted by woohoo View PostNever understood the problem of being a contractor with a client for a number of years. I know many companies that have long standing relationships with client, suppliers etc. Obviously, if they act like an employee then that's different but not sure why the number of years has anything to do with it.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBecause in a majority of situations that is exactly what happens. There isn't a problem with the principle as you say but the reality is often very different. Most on here won't be like that as they are taking the time to know what they are. There is a large majority of people out there that don't really understand, just get on with it and just make themselves a target as MMM says.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by Eirikur View PostThe best thing of being inside IR35 is that we can get normal mortgages againComment
-
I haven't sent the below to my MP yet so any advice on where I have made errors or phrased things badly would be appreciated.
Cheers
I’m writing in regard to the rumoured extension of the off-payroll rules to the private sector. I contacted you last year prior to these changes being introduced to the Public Sector. I and many others predicated that the introduction of the rules in such a haphazard way would prove disastrous for the Public Sector and it turns out we were right. HMRC have presented a version of events that deems the introduction of these rules as a ‘success’. I’d like to see what their criteria for ‘success’ is but I can guarantee it is not the same measure that any reasonable business would use. There have been delays in numerous critical Public Sector Projects (TFL etc.) due to the application of these rules and the Public Sector has found it extremely difficult to hire the talent they need and are having to increase rates to secure it. I wonder has anyone in Government factored the increase in costs to Public Sector Bodies against any perceived increase in tax take?
Contractors have also left Public Sector Bodies in droves due to blanket assessments that everyone working through a PSC was ‘inside’ IR35 even though this goes against the HMRC guidelines that reasonable care be given to each determination. However it has since been discovered that HMRC have been advising Public Sector bodies in a way that encouraged blanket determinations. This has resulted in a legal challenge by Locums, the first of many one would assume!
Most organisations and Public Bodies take a low risk approach to legislation that could potentially result in penalties. As IR35 is a complex piece of legislation (with many grey areas) it is unreasonable to expect businesses to assess the working conditions of each and every contractor working for them with the expertise required to make an accurate determination. To help with this issue HMRC have introduced CEST, a tool that was late in its release and one that has gone through many updates and revisions since. CEST is somehow supposed to reduce years of case law to a number of straightforward questions that will result in an accurate determination of status. Unfortunately the tool is what HMRC want it to be (something that classes the vast majority of people inside IR35) rather than a fair and unbiased assessment of existing case law. They have even left out one of the key tests ‘Mutuality of Obligation’ from the tool and they claim to have done this intentionally! No court in the country would accept a CEST tool determination as an accurate assessment of IR35 status but Public Sector bodies are informed that this is the only result HMRC will accept when trying to assess status. In what universe is this ‘fair’? How have we got to a point where the tail is wagging the dog? Do Government just follow HMRC’s instruction even though it contradicts the laws of the land and has a direct negative impact on businesses both small and large in this country?
Disguised employment is a problem and most contractors recognise this. However this does not justify the approach being considered as a solution as there will be negative outcomes for the vast majority of contractors and the businesses that use them. The upheaval and uncertainty that extending the off-payroll rules will cause will have a direct negative impact on an already fragile economy and it will drive many self-employed people away from the Conservative Party. Most self-employed people do not want to vote for Labour or Corbyn but they are being forced in that direction by a Conservative Government who seem intent on penalising small businesses in every budget and have also created wider economic uncertainty with Brexit. This is confusing given the Governments tenuous grip on power… why attack your own voter base?
The increased Tax that HMRC hope to gain does not justify the wider problems that this legislation will create. There are plenty of sensible and business friendly measures that can be implemented to help tackle disguised employment. The Taylor report needs to be implemented in a structured way over an extended period of time that will give businesses the time and space to adapt.
It is not fair to force an individual to pay tax in the same way as an employee but at the same time deny them access to any of the associated rights. Contractors have no entitlement to Holiday Pay, Sick Pay, Severance and their contracts can terminated on a day’s notice. Contractors take risks and perform a vital role in the economy. Having a flexible labour force creates an environment where businesses are encouraged to invest without having the burden of having to employ additional permanent staff. To try and compare a permanent employee on PAYE to a contractor who has no rights is not fair. The government’s position that people doing similar work should pay the same taxes because it’s an issue of fairness is disingenuous in the extreme. For the analysis to focus only on activities carried out is to ignore the many vital differences that justify a different tax approach.
Please do not underestimate the strength of feeling in the Contracting community over these changes. I think the extension of these rules to the Private sector will weaken the government at one of the most crucial periods in recent history.
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment