Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Yes, they're nuclear bombs. In other words, he's suggesting averting the threat of a nuclear conflict by setting off "a few wide spread" nuclear weapons in the potential conflict zone
“China probably excluded this pipeline for the same reason that it has insisted on humanitarian or normal economic trade clauses in previous resolutions – both to protect Chinese business interests and to keep the North Korea oil supplies at levels sufficient to ensure that [North Korea’s] society will not break down,” von Hippel said. “The Chinese fear [this] will result in a flood of refugees coming across its border, as well as ... geopolitical chaos.”
EMP will have the same result - society break down, starvation and waves of refugees. Just because the EMP blat itself is ore or less harmless to the civilian populations, doesn't mean it's not going to affect them
Comment