Originally posted by AtW
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
John Major warns on the peace process
Collapse
X
-
-
You'll find that Sinn Fein will purely play this for their own means. There aren't people in NI up-in-arms about this.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostNot only that, if a power sharing agreement isn't worked out fast (end of the month). Then it is direct rule from Westminster. And direct rule means Tory-DUP government in charge.
This is extremely worrying. TM's lust for power at all costs is frightening.Comment
-
Thats not really true. The NI troubles have claimed very many civilian lives over their time.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostThe IRA where better at causing disruption. They also preferred to target the UK government, armed forces and police over members of the public with their bombs.
They destroyed buildings in the city and docklands and also murdered a bunch of innocent people outside Harrods and again in Birmingham... They were admittedly a little more focused than the current bunch of bastards but thats hardly difficult...
The only reason the IRA stopped was that our friends the Americans finally understood what terrorism was when some maniac levelled two of their buildings in one go on prime time TV. Up until that point they were more than happy to let the IRA tin get passed around for contributions to buy Libyan arms...
Incidentally 9/11 killed almost exactly the same number of innocent people as the entire NI conflict in the previous 20 years...
The most sensible answer from what I can see of the maths is for the DUP to follow SF's lead and stop taking their seat in the UK parliament. That way there would not be enough seats for the opposition to form a government and an effective majority would be in place.Comment
-
I spent many years of my life having to use alternative public transport or walking in London because the IRA had sent out a coded bomb warning but I guess that doesn't count as disruption.Originally posted by bobspud View PostThats not really true. The NI troubles have claimed very many civilian lives over their time.
In addition some helpful people have collateral statistics of the number of dead on the mainland and what roles they were in. The number of dead and roles in NI is obviously different."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
So why don't we include people in NI as well. They are also people.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostI spent many years of my life having to use alternative public transport or walking in London because the IRA had sent out a coded bomb warning but I guess that doesn't count as disruption.
In addition some helpful people have collateral statistics of the number of dead on the mainland and what roles they were in. The number of dead and roles in NI is obviously different.Comment
-
Be nice if they actually took their seats in Parliament instead of sulking too.Originally posted by The_Equalizer View PostYou'll find that Sinn Fein will purely play this for their own means. There aren't people in NI up-in-arms about this.Comment
-
It's not really sulking, is it? Having stood on a mandate of not taking their seats, they're not going to then take their seats.Originally posted by original PM View PostBe nice if they actually took their seats in Parliament instead of sulking too.
Which I kind of get, but it is all a bit odd. I wonder if SDLP will do better at the next GE, after people see a close result where SF abstentionism is arguably a factor in the ability of the Tories to form a government.
I don't really understand NI politics - what do you think, Equalizer?Comment
-
Serious question now.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostIt's not really sulking, is it? Having stood on a mandate of not taking their seats, they're not going to then take their seats.
Which I kind of get, but it is all a bit odd. I wonder if SDLP will do better at the next GE, after people see a close result where SF abstentionism is arguably a factor in the ability of the Tories to form a government.
I don't really understand NI politics - what do you think, Equalizer?
Do they vote on issues in commons but just do not attend - or do they simple play no part?Comment
-
They don't take their seats at all. They are never sworn in as MPs.Originally posted by original PM View PostSerious question now.
Do they vote on issues in commons but just do not attend - or do they simple play no part?Comment
-
Because the amount of tulip they have had from all sides is not countable as it includes the disappeared.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostSo why don't we include people in NI as well. They are also people."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Today 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Yesterday 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment