Originally posted by MrMarkyMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Speaking personally on Corbyn...
Collapse
X
-
-
This is straight from the manifesto...Originally posted by radish2008 View PostWhere did he say that ? Add a link to your post with some evidence.
We would also extend the rights of
employees to all workers, including
shared parental pay, making a
substantial and immediate difference
to the quality of life of people in
insecure work.
It is on page 51.Comment
-
Play nice. That's not a bad hourly rate for oop north.Originally posted by sasguru View PostJeez, you lot really slum it.Comment
-
Errrrm, I was talking about PS roles inside IR35Originally posted by sasguru View PostJeez, you lot really slum it.
i.e. you are now contributing to the extra £150 PD as a tax payer, I can send you a picture if you would like
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
The tax payer gets the money back as tax. But the PS budget is unchanged so it is a stealth cut.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostErrrrm, I was talking about PS roles inside IR35
i.e. you are now contributing to the extra £150 PD as a tax payer, I can send you a picture if you would like
Comment
-
I see the tax payer paying roughly the same as before in my example.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostThe tax payer gets the money back as tax. But the PS budget is unchanged so it is a stealth cut.
It just looks good that these contractors are being nailed for the extra tax.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
So it is an effective budget cut for PS.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostI see the tax payer paying roughly the same as before in my example.
It just looks good that these contractors are being nailed for the extra tax.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment