Originally posted by MrMarkyMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Speaking personally on Corbyn...
Collapse
X
-
-
This is straight from the manifesto...Originally posted by radish2008 View PostWhere did he say that ? Add a link to your post with some evidence.
We would also extend the rights of
employees to all workers, including
shared parental pay, making a
substantial and immediate difference
to the quality of life of people in
insecure work.
It is on page 51.Comment
-
Play nice. That's not a bad hourly rate for oop north.Originally posted by sasguru View PostJeez, you lot really slum it.Comment
-
Errrrm, I was talking about PS roles inside IR35Originally posted by sasguru View PostJeez, you lot really slum it.
i.e. you are now contributing to the extra £150 PD as a tax payer, I can send you a picture if you would like
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
The tax payer gets the money back as tax. But the PS budget is unchanged so it is a stealth cut.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostErrrrm, I was talking about PS roles inside IR35
i.e. you are now contributing to the extra £150 PD as a tax payer, I can send you a picture if you would like
Comment
-
I see the tax payer paying roughly the same as before in my example.Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostThe tax payer gets the money back as tax. But the PS budget is unchanged so it is a stealth cut.
It just looks good that these contractors are being nailed for the extra tax.The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
So it is an effective budget cut for PS.Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostI see the tax payer paying roughly the same as before in my example.
It just looks good that these contractors are being nailed for the extra tax.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment