Originally posted by _V_
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Loony Labour
Collapse
X
-
Sure, as I said, IHT isn't the vehicle I'd choose, as it's insensitive, but the tax system massively favours property wealth as distinct from other assets and earned/unearned income, and it embeds this across generations. As with many other reliefs, IHT includes special provision for property. Whatever form property taxes take, they need to increase relative to other taxes (if not in absolute terms) and with a focus on boosting supply. The problem with stamp duty, for example, is that it reduces supply. -
Boosting housing supply is absolutely futile, worse than useless in fact, if all it does is give politicians the opportunity to bus in ever more immigrants to take up the slack. We'll be back to square one with even more people deprived of houses they need and even less countryside.Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostAs with many other reliefs, IHT includes special provision for property. Whatever form property taxes take, they need to increase relative to other taxes (if not in absolute terms) and with a focus on boosting supply. ...
This is what Labour did in the early 2000s, in a failed attempt to "lock in" a new underclass loyally obligated to them (so they hoped, and they actually admitted this), and it's what they would/will undoubtedly do again if given half a chance.
Although Labour have historically been the main culprits, Tories are far from blameless, and all have been constrained to some extent by EU policies and the ridiculous human rights treaty.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
It's not a shock, Labour have always been pro-IHT haven't they? Whether it's nuts is a question of idealism - should money be yours when you die or not - so there are only subjective arguments based on personal viewpoints. I'm anti-IHT myself any imagine most here are also since we're largely quite right-wing.
The IHT allowance is a great idea IF you are pro-IHT as it means you can still pass money on up to quite a large amount.
Note that Tories were trying to put up IHT by another name in the probate sliding scale fees which they have dropped between Budget and GE, but are probably likely to go after.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Today 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Yesterday 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Comment