Originally posted by Pip in a Poke
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Cyclists All
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View PostWhat were you riding? A penny farthing?

Standard 1970's geometry. 72 parallel. 27 inch wheels, 1 1/4 inch high pressure(!!) tyres.



Actually, the frame was that old when I got it, it was probably from the 1960s.
[mansplaining] I just realised what you might have meant. Not a penny farthing
67 inch gear. 48 tooth chainwheel, 19 tooth rear sprocket. Although it was a single gear, the sprocket was free, not fixed (actually, that comes out at 68 inch, I must have misremembered over the intervening 35+ years...)[/mansplaining]
Last edited by RetSet; 11 April 2017, 19:24.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
So, the 67 inches I took to be the size of the wheel (hence penny farthing) is the product of the number of teeth on your chain ring and your rear cog?Originally posted by RetSet View Post
[mansplaining] I just realised what you might have meant. Not a penny farthing
67 inch gear. 48 tooth chainwheel, 19 tooth rear sprocket. Although it was a single gear, the sprocket was free, not fixed (actually, that comes out at 68 inch, I must have misremembered over the intervening 35+ years...)[/mansplaining]Comment
-
The very aged among will recall that bicycle gearing was measured in terms of the equivalent penny farthing (properly called an "Ordinary") front wheel diameter, until most started having gears on them.Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View PostSo, the 67 inches I took to be the size of the wheel (hence penny farthing) is the product of the number of teeth on your chain ring and your rear cog?
Incidentally I have a certificate upstairs to the effect that I rode the Coddington Flyer, a genuine penny farthing, in the mid 50s. Since I would have been in junior school, I have no idea (or recollection) how I achieved that feat!Blog? What blog...?
Comment
-
Comment
-
And the wheel size (27 inches).Originally posted by Pip in a Poke View PostSo, the 67 inches I took to be the size of the wheel (hence penny farthing) is the product of the number of teeth on your chain ring and your rear cog?
Thus (48/19)*27 = 68
Way too high for the ride in question. But I did it
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to land a temporary technology job in 2026 Jan 9 07:01
- Spring Forecast 2026 ‘won’t put up taxes on contractors’ Jan 8 07:26
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Jan 7 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Jan 6 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22

Comment