Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Logical Interview Question
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAnswer it and ask them to solve something else. When they protest tell them stupid irrelevant interview questions can be asked by both parties.Comment
-
If that were true the answer proposed is also wrong.Originally posted by europetractor View PostInvalid because the rope burns at a different rate throughout its length.
In either case they did not say the rope burns at a different rate, they said inconsistently.
My answer is actually better now that I think about it. You've two measuring sticks rather than one.Last edited by scooterscot; 8 March 2017, 21:21."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostIf that were true the answer proposed is also wrong.
In either case they did not say the rope burns at a different rate, they said inconsistently.
My answer is actually better now that I think about it. You've measuring sticks rather than one.
Yes inconsistently has to mean it can burn 80 percent of its length in 30 seconds and then burn the other part for 59 minutes and 30 seconds. Anyway I don't care about this question.Comment
-
Clutching at straws now
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Did you get the gig?Originally posted by europetractor View PostYes inconsistently has to mean it can burn 80 percent of its length in 30 seconds and then burn the other part for 59 minutes and 30 seconds. Anyway I don't care about this question.
Comment
-
No, see you in the civil war. :P Bring more than a rope.Originally posted by teapot418 View PostDid you get the gig?
Comment
-
A lighter?Originally posted by europetractor View PostNo, see you in the civil war. :P Bring more than a rope."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
No, a watch.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostA lighter?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment