Originally posted by scooterscot
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Logical Interview Question
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAnswer it and ask them to solve something else. When they protest tell them stupid irrelevant interview questions can be asked by both parties.Comment
-
If that were true the answer proposed is also wrong.Originally posted by europetractor View PostInvalid because the rope burns at a different rate throughout its length.
In either case they did not say the rope burns at a different rate, they said inconsistently.
My answer is actually better now that I think about it. You've two measuring sticks rather than one.Last edited by scooterscot; 8 March 2017, 21:21."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by scooterscot View PostIf that were true the answer proposed is also wrong.
In either case they did not say the rope burns at a different rate, they said inconsistently.
My answer is actually better now that I think about it. You've measuring sticks rather than one.
Yes inconsistently has to mean it can burn 80 percent of its length in 30 seconds and then burn the other part for 59 minutes and 30 seconds. Anyway I don't care about this question.Comment
-
Clutching at straws now
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
Did you get the gig?Originally posted by europetractor View PostYes inconsistently has to mean it can burn 80 percent of its length in 30 seconds and then burn the other part for 59 minutes and 30 seconds. Anyway I don't care about this question.
Comment
-
No, see you in the civil war. :P Bring more than a rope.Originally posted by teapot418 View PostDid you get the gig?
Comment
-
A lighter?Originally posted by europetractor View PostNo, see you in the civil war. :P Bring more than a rope."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
No, a watch.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostA lighter?…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Yesterday 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment