• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

She should have been locked up!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by snaw
    Care to watch how you phrase things - calling people fuzzy wuzzies is overstepping the line big time, no matter how much you meant it in jest, or how valid your actual point may be.
    Sorry, I should have used to technically correct name of ***!

    Mailman

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Troll
      I can just see all the criminals adopting this & standing in the dock wearing a veil...

      Prosecution to the witness: "do you see the accused standing before you in this court"

      err no


      Would make police line-ups fun as well...

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Mailman
        Sorry, I should have used to technically correct name of ***!

        Mailman
        You know, you had a perfectly valid point, screwed up by your not so latent racism. It added nothing to your post beyond making you look like the bigot you probably are.

        There's a line that seems easy for some people to cross when they hide behind the anonymity of a computer screen that in real life they wouldn't do, because in civilised society it's rightly considered offensive. Stop acting like a knob and cut out the offensive crap, it's not needed.
        Hang on - there is actually a place called Cheddar?? - cailin maith

        Any forum is a collection of assorted weirdos, cranks and pervs - Board Game Geek

        That will be a simply fab time to catch up for a beer. - Tay

        Have you ever seen somebody lick the chutney spoon in an Indian Restaurant and put it back ? - Cyberghoul

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by snaw
          Stop acting like a knob
          That could be a major problem for Mailman.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Troll
            From BBC:

            Legal advisers and solicitors may wear the Islamic veil in court unless it interferes with the "interests of justice", judges have been told.
            Oh FFS!

            How many Muslim advocates have operated without a veil in the approx 800 years of the religion.

            Are we going to get a spate of appeals on the grounds of an unfair trail 'exuse me M'lud I did n't get a fair trial - I could n't understand a word my lawyer said'

            It is not a requirement of the Muslim religion - it is a requirement of a small fringe that has it's roots in Saudi Arabia.

            Comment


              #26
              Erm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.

              We have people who do all sorts in this country. Just because wearing a veil has a religious connotation shouldn't make it any different.

              If we let people wear what they want, believe in a right to express freely, then that extends to people who want to cover up as much as it extends to people who want to show more flesh or dress in questionable styles.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by JaredM
                Erm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.
                Yeah.. freedom of speech and expression ... great innit!!.... who would have thought a few cartoons would have caused such a stir....did you join the protest?
                How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by JaredM
                  Erm we live in a soceity that preaches freedom of expression and freedom of speech.

                  We have people who do all sorts in this country. Just because wearing a veil has a religious connotation shouldn't make it any different.

                  If we let people wear what they want, believe in a right to express freely, then that extends to people who want to cover up as much as it extends to people who want to show more flesh or dress in questionable styles.
                  Are you saying then that you will equally defend my right to teach children wearing nothing at all, because, just perhaps, my own little group of believers consider only the first few paragraphs of the bible to be true, and therefore we should all be naked before God?

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Problem solved.

                    They've changed the judge...

                    They have also replaced her.

                    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/staffordshire/6142520.stm
                    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      It gets even better

                      She's been signed off on the sick. Due to stress no doubt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X