• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Trump's Policies

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
    Clearly exagerated? All universities in the world in the top 100 are pursuing the research to examine the impact of this - which is clear and absolute in stating it is much more severe than expected and the rate of change is faster than expected.

    Do you even know any university researchers? They are intent on truth and discovering objective facts, something you are, and have been, unable to discern for the entirety of your presence on this forum.

    The pursuance of truth with integrity was what has driven our society from enlightenment. You REALLY want a Trumpesque post-truth era? Seriously? If "wot i rekon" is your modus operandi and this spreads then we end up wanting things that can, long term, come back to massively reduce the quality of society and stunt the intellectual development of the world for generations.

    I'll continue to concentrate on objective facts rather than joining the throng of those who clearly have and use racial prejudice undertones to their arguments.

    As much as I agree that the global elite have partially caused this, the base extincts appear (read: appear) to be that of racism and pro-white superiority.

    One word - "Sugar".
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
      I gotta say, just listened to the victory speech, from the DM's website

      Donald Trump wins US Election | Daily Mail Online

      Difficult to argue with that speech - the first 7 minutes.

      Have a listen

      Milan.
      Compare his speech to that given by Nixon when he won in 68. There are plenty of parallels, and what ensued didn't quite match what was promised in the aftermath of the election.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
        Clearly exagerated? All universities in the world in the top 100 are pursuing the research to examine the impact of this - which is clear and absolute in stating it is much more severe than expected and the rate of change is faster than expected.

        Do you even know any university researchers? They are intent on truth and discovering objective facts, something you are, and have been, unable to discern for the entirety of your presence on this forum.

        The pursuance of truth with integrity was what has driven our society from enlightenment. You REALLY want a Trumpesque post-truth era? Seriously? If "wot i rekon" is your modus operandi and this spreads then we end up wanting things that can, long term, come back to massively reduce the quality of society and stunt the intellectual development of the world for generations.

        I'll continue to concentrate on objective facts rather than joining the throng of those who clearly have and use racial prejudice undertones to their arguments.

        As much as I agree that the global elite have partially caused this, the base extincts appear (read: appear) to be that of racism and pro-white superiority.


        I am with DA here, this subject seems to have been hijacked as a bandwagon for certain groups to use as a reason for punitive taxes

        Of course those who are in it and benefitting from it will champion the subject, I am sure there are probably zillions of grants available for Universities to help with research to prove the theory
        it's a self fulfilling prophecy, we tax 'em and then give that money to the universities to help us find more evidence to tax 'em more

        except this is not balanced, and the countries being subjected to this punishment the most are the ones who polute the least

        Milan.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
          Clearly exagerated? All universities in the world in the top 100 are pursuing the research to examine the impact of this - which is clear and absolute in stating it is much more severe than expected and the rate of change is faster than expected.

          Do you even know any university researchers? They are intent on truth and discovering objective facts, something you are, and have been, unable to discern for the entirety of your presence on this forum.

          The pursuance of truth with integrity was what has driven our society from enlightenment. You REALLY want a Trumpesque post-truth era? Seriously? If "wot i rekon" is your modus operandi and this spreads then we end up wanting things that can, long term, come back to massively reduce the quality of society and stunt the intellectual development of the world for generations.

          I'll continue to concentrate on objective facts rather than joining the throng of those who clearly have and use racial prejudice undertones to their arguments.

          As much as I agree that the global elite have partially caused this, the base extincts appear (read: appear) to be that of racism and pro-white superiority.
          If you look at any presentation of anything to do with climate change it will be accompanied by a picture of some sort of extreme event - usually a storm, dead animals or a forest fire. All of these happen all the time and always have done. Pictures of floods abound and the climate has always changed. These images however are exploited in order to manipulate people into thinking that incidents of unpleasant climate events are caused by man. So whilst there is overwhelming evidence of climate change - which is irrefutable the climate change lobby are twisting it as if it is :

          1. caused by human beings
          2. can be changed by human beings.

          Whilst I accept that human beings may contribute to climate change I do not accept that paying money to climate scientists, researchers and wind farm manufacturers will reverse the change. I also do not accept that there is an "ideal" climate scenario that can be attained anyway (though the climate lobby seem to think there is).
          Furthermore your precious researchers may be in the business of investigating science but they are human beings like everyone else. if their cause is to save the planet then their position and importance is elevated such that if they can produce outcomes that perpetuate fear then even better for them.

          The whole point is that what people do not want is an intellectual elite exploiting phenomenoms like climate change giving them cart blanche to tell the rest of society how to live their lives.

          It is weasel cliches like this The pursuance of truth with integrity was what has driven our society from enlightenment. You REALLY want a Trumpesque post-truth era? Seriously? If "wot i rekon" is your modus operandi and this spreads then we end up wanting things that can, long term, come back to massively reduce the quality of society and stunt the intellectual development of the world for generations. which presume that your ilk have exclusive access to truth and therefore a divine right to interpret "their" truth in order to tell everyone else how to live their lives. It is this bu**sh*t that people are fed up with.
          The real truth is that people like you think you are the sole purveyors of truth and wisdom yet change nothing other than your own bank accounts. And they have had enough of you and your institutions.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
            is this the first time in a long time that one party in the US had both houses and the presidency ?
            Define "long time"

            2009-2011 Democrats
            2003-2007 Republicans
            1992-1995 Democrats
            1977-1981 Democrats
            1961-1969 Democrats
            1949-1953 Democrats
            1933-1947 Democrats
            1921-1931 Republicans
            1913-1919 Democrats
            1901-1911 Republicans

            I can't be bothered to go back further than that.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
              All universities in the world in the top 100 are pursuing the research grants to examine the impact of this, whilst simultaneously ensuring their own comfy salaried existences continue for many years to come!
              ftfy

              Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
              Do you even know any university researchers? They are intent on ensuring the conditions continue to exist in which they can carve out a well-funded and privileged career path running all manner of gerrymandered computer modelling programmes to produce whatever results are de rigeur, and appeal most to the vocal treehugging elite. There also exists the possibility, however unlikely, that whilst doing this they may stumble across some truth and discover a few objective facts,
              ftfy too.

              As for the rest of your pious condescending tripe, I can't even be arsed to pull it any further apart.
              “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by dundeedude View Post
                Do you even know any university researchers?

                T.
                I did once shag one. She then denied it to everyone else because she was ashamed to do such a thing with a recruitment agent. So as an act of revenge I am denying climate change .
                So don't give us this pious sh*t about groups of people having integrity just because of what they are supposed to do.

                Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by missinggreenfields View Post
                  Define "long time"

                  2009-2011 Democrats
                  2003-2007 Republicans
                  1992-1995 Democrats
                  1977-1981 Democrats
                  1961-1969 Democrats
                  1949-1953 Democrats
                  1933-1947 Democrats
                  1921-1931 Republicans
                  1913-1919 Democrats
                  1901-1911 Republicans

                  I can't be bothered to go back further than that.
                  thanks I was right then the first time in 6 years that one party had both houses

                  Milan.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    If he were to "press the button", that should ensure some excellent skiing seasons.
                    I'm alright Jack

                    Comment


                      #40
                      As long as he doesn't have to think too much about foreign policy and complicated stuff he will do quite well domestically. He will build lots of stuff, improve infrastructure etc as that is how he sees the world.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X