Every £ of EU funding to undergo 'national interest' test to ensure it benefits UK

[darmstadt]

Democracy is adhering to the expressed wishes of 52% of the electorate and not constantly harping on about it like a broken record.

HTH

So let's rerun referendum and see how democracy speaks out, you like democracy don't you?

Seems like a lot of people don't realise that it was actually only an 'advisory referendum' which means that Parliament could ignore it if they so wished, in other words:

"The referendum result is not legally binding – Parliament still has to pass the laws that will get Britain out of the 28 nation bloc, starting with the repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act."

Which probably explains why the government will continue to delay the repeal of the act until the day AtW eventually gets a sofa

[Old Greg]

I care because if this promise is not kept, then the very close result was won on a totally FRAUDULENT basis, very material in nature since the promise was high profile - failure to fulfil it should be grounds to rerunning referendum, before it's too late.

This isn't democracy - this is FRAUD

On the other hand, there is not much sign of article 50.

[GB9]

It says £350 mln on the bus, are you blind?

"Only" £100 mln per week is £5.2 bln per year, which is more than expected to raise from 25% increase in dividend taxes

I can see it says £350m. It's actually £375m.

It says let's fund the NHS instead.

Where does it say let's put all the £350m (+) into the NHS? It doesn't. You have pretended to interpret it that way because it suits the carp you churn out.

Do you even understand basic English? Clearly not. Your second paragraph makes no sense at all.

Have you considered English lessons?

[VectraMan]

I can see it says £350m. It's actually £375m.

It says let's fund the NHS instead.

Where does it say let's put all the £350m (+) into the NHS? It doesn't. You have pretended to interpret it that way because it suits the carp you churn out.

Do you even understand basic English? Clearly not. Your second paragraph makes no sense at all.

Have you considered English lessons?

HTH.

Guys you won! Why can't you now admit that it was a lie? What difference does it make? Just be honest about it and move on.

[GB9]

HTH.

Guys you won! Why can't you now admit that it was a lie? What difference does it make? Just be honest about it and move on.

Yes, we won.

The official figure was £100m. You read all you want into whatever you want to suit.

The main lie was it isn't £350m. It's £375m according to the latest ONS figure.

[shaunbhoy]

Guys you won! Why can't you now admit that it was a lie? What difference does it make? Just be honest about it and move on.

That might happen after the Bremoaners admit that they LOST and move on.

HTH

[darmstadt]

The main lie was it isn't £350m. It's £375m according to the latest ONS figure.

Still waiting for a link to this one...doubt we'll see one though

[VectraMan]

Yes, we won.

The official figure was £100m. You read all you want into whatever you want to suit.

Which official figure? The one on the poster?

Dear GB9,

I apologise over the confusion of the rate. When the contract said £400 per day it was never intended to mean that you'd receive ALL of the £400 per day.

I hope that clarifies the situation.

GB9's agent.

[AtW]

The official figure was £100m.

It could have only been official if I said so, and I didn't say so!

[AtW]

The main lie was it isn't £350m. It's £375m according to the latest ONS figure.

Ok, great keep £25 mln, the figure promised publicly for NHS was £350 mln, even if somewhere somebody promised £100 mln that means nothing because the most high profile HIGHEST promise was £350 mln, so not implementing it would mean that this referendum was won very closely on a MAJOR FRAUDLENT CLAIM. On that basis it should be annulled by the Supreme Court.