• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

It's Team UK now.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
    Liechtenstein.
    So Canada with a population of 36,000,000 doesn't have a deal for Financial Services. Why did you mention it? Out of of ignorance or mendacity?

    Is Liechtenstein with a population of 37,000 your best bet now?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
      Oh I see. You're going for the Lichtenstein/small population model.
      Shrink your population down to a few thousand then claim they would be overwhelmed if free movement was allowed.
      Or is it the Canadian model where financial services are excluded?
      Both models are much clearer than your glorious leaders have put forward, I suppose.
      Population density of Lichtenstein is 233

      http://www.tradingeconomics.com/liec...m-wb-data.html

      Population density of UK is 266

      http://www.tradingeconomics.com/unit...m-wb-data.html

      The gorilla says we go for the Lichtenstein model.
      http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
        Oh I see. You're going for the Lichtenstein/small population model.
        Shrink your population down to a few thousand then claim they would be overwhelmed if free movement was allowed.
        Or is it the Canadian model where financial services are excluded?
        Both models are much clearer than your glorious leaders have put forward, I suppose.
        There is always the Greenlandic model where we reduce our population to <100,000 and become a constituent country of Denmark.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
          How do you do that? You been increasing gym visits recently?
          Stop being negative, work harder, be proud.
          http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
            Stop being negative, work harder, be proud.
            I'm not being negative. I will be working quite hard on fixing my Douro farmhouse from which I plan to watch the chaos from afar. I'm quite proud that I had the foresight to get a bolthole.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
              We all need to MTFU
              Sure. How about we start with Cornwall, Yorkshire, and Wales. MTFU and stop moaning about London needing to send you money.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
                Population density of Lichtenstein is 233

                POPULATION DENSITY (PEOPLE PER SQ. KM) IN LIECHTENSTEIN

                Population density of UK is 266

                POPULATION DENSITY (PEOPLE PER SQ. KM) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM

                The gorilla says we go for the Lichtenstein model.
                Is that because the gorilla is a cretin?

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                  Is that because the gorilla is a cretin?
                  So what would be your choice for BREXIT clever clogs?
                  http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
                    So what would be your choice for BREXIT clever clogs?
                    You voted for it, he didn't. You mean you had no plan for BREXIT? That's not terribly smart now, is it?
                    I mean some might even say it's, how shall I put it, completely cretinous.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by CretinWatcher View Post
                      You voted for it, he didn't. You mean you had no plan for BREXIT? That's not terribly smart now, is it?
                      I mean some might even say it's, how shall I put it, completely cretinous.
                      My plan is press the article 50 button and get the **** out already. I don't give a **** about finance, London, free movement negotiations, or a contraction of our economy. That's my plan. Happy to lie in that bed. What I don't need to hear, constantly, is "I told you so's" standing on the touch line not wanting to ruck up and play the game.
                      http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X