Originally posted by Buffoon
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Interesting fact about making a nuke from New Scientist
Collapse
X
-
I heard they had altered the composition of ammonium nitrate to prevent it going popHow fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think -
Yeah, they mix in some aluminium powder and it makes a wonderful weedkiller, especially against daisys. Doesn't go 'pop', more of a 'whump'.Originally posted by TrollI heard they had altered the composition of ammonium nitrate to prevent it going popInsanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
threadeds website, and here's my blog.
Comment
-
From the New Scientist article:Originally posted by PaddyComplete and utter b’locks. A reaction can only take place if compression is from all direction, hence why timing is the key to making a bomb. Korea is currently only get 10% of the yield because it can bot get the timing right.
Still Bollocks?The POGO report also argues that improvising a nuclear bomb using Y-12's highly enriched uranium would be a relatively easy task for terrorists on site. Simply dropping one 45-kilogram lump onto another from about 1.8 metres could create a 10-kiloton explosion, it says, killing or injuring up to 60,000 people. The prospect, however, is dismissed as "fanciful" by the DoE's National Nuclear Security Administration. "There are better odds that an asteroid would hit Oak Ridge," says an NNSA spokesman. "The facility is well prepared to defeat a terrorist attack."First Law of Contracting: Only the strong surviveComment
-
Surely that's not entirely accurate.Originally posted by PaddyComplete and utter b’locks. A reaction can only take place if compression is from all direction, hence why timing is the key to making a bomb. Korea is currently only get 10% of the yield because it can bot get the timing right.
If you use small masses of fissile material then, yes, timing and high energy inputs, and symmetry are critical to get a runaway reaction.
If you use fecking big chunks of the stuff (which is really desperate to go critical anyway) then it doesn't take much finesse to lob them together using any old explosives (or even gravity as the article suggests) and get a huge nuclear bang.
Hard to see how anyone would come across such large amounts of enriched Uranium etc. tho.
You've come right out the other side of the forest of irony and ended up in the desert of wrong.
Comment
-
Wrong!Originally posted by PaddyComplete and utter b’locks. A reaction can only take place if compression is from all direction, hence why timing is the key to making a bomb. Korea is currently only get 10% of the yield because it can bot get the timing right.
With enriched uranium, you can achieve fission just by using a gun device.
I suspect that dropping the 2nd lump from 6 feet probably does not qualify for this definition (coz it's likely to fizzle because the lump is not travelling fast enough).
And this remarkable object achieves criticality with 54kg of 93.7% HEU.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godiva...e-scrammed.jpg
Without generating 10kT.
Last edited by zeitghost; 17 February 2017, 10:53.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment