Immigration misinformation and propaganda discussion

[NotAllThere]

I thought the same when I saw it. I can imagine his IQ level.
Constructive discussions are very rare over here.

Says Bee, constructively.

Can I change the title of this thread to NotAllThere 0.24%? (I know, I know - INKSPE)

[FatLazyContractor]

I thought the same when I saw it. I can imagine his IQ level.
Constructive discussions are very rare over here.

Can you please stop polluting the decorum of General ?

[OwlHoot]

The erroneous assumption made is that all the migrants coming into EU are refugees, fleeing from war etc.

But a lot (60%) of the migrants are economic migrants and NOT refugees.

That is my point. Perhaps I should have written a few more words around this but I presumed the good folk reading would understand.

As for humiliating, throwing some stupid insults at me before locking the thread without the right to reply just makes NAS look like a tulip.

That was a good map you posted PG

Any economic migrant from Sudan who ends up in Murmansk has really drawn the short straw, temperature wise

Also, dhoog made a fair point about refugees not needing permanent sanctuary; but no doubt that's what will end up happening after the war is over.

[PurpleGorilla]

I see. So you're at the around £100K a year before tax. Still not poor. There are certainly people on this site who earn considerably less than that.

So I stand by my assessment of sense-of-humour failure.

When did I say I haven't done well with my limited intellect?

Amazing how little that level of earnings gets you in terms of housing, but that is another topic.

[PurpleGorilla]

Can you please stop polluting the decorum of General ?

What are you having for lunch?

[FatLazyContractor]

What are you having for lunch?

Steak and Ale pie with mushy peas

[Bee]

Says Bee, constructively.

Can I change the title of this thread to NotAllThere 0.24%? (I know, I know - INKSPE)

Any score below 3 it's ok.

[NotAllThere]

When did I say I haven't done well with my limited intellect?

Amazing how little that level of earnings gets you in terms of housing, but that is another topic.

I have never suggested that you haven't done well on your limited intellect. You took offence at being called poor when you earn ~100K a year - you found it patronising, instead of recognising that it was (at attempt perhaps at being) humourous.

This is why I closed the other thread. You were posting more and more stuff trying to counter an argument that wasn't there, and not realising that what you were posting was not supporting your argument much either. It's fine to be a bit fick - but must your flaunt it so much?

[PurpleGorilla]

NotAllThere - 60%

I have never suggested that you haven't done well on your limited intellect. You took offence at being called poor when you earn ~100K a year - you found it patronising, instead of recognising that it was (at attempt perhaps at being) humourous.

This is why I closed the other thread. You were posting more and more stuff trying to counter an argument that wasn't there, and not realising that what you were posting was not supporting your argument much either. It's fine to be a bit fick - but must your flaunt it so much?

I took offence at the patronising use of the word poor in you whimsical pun.

I am proud of my success, I know how fortunate I am, I also know how much more fortunate others have been.

As for my argument in the other thread. The constant banging on about migrants only being refugees from Syria fleeing war needed to be challenged.

Perhaps I should have used a little more narrative, but the charts speak for themselves.

Once again more insults about being 'fick'.

PG

[BrilloPad]

Once again more insults about being 'fick'.

One expects it from the uber cretin sas. But not from other posters.