- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Damn Sharapova ...
Collapse
X
-
-
It wasn't retrospectively banned - the final decision was made last September and the ban took effect this January - she failed the test shortly afterwards.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostSounds hard done by to me.
She's been taking something which wasn't banned for ten years. They decide to retrospectively ban it, she doesn't realize and gets caught.
Sounds like HMRC to meComment
-
Don't confuse MF with fact and reality - you know that's not his strongest area.Originally posted by centurian View PostIt wasn't retrospectively banned - the final decision was made last September and the ban took effect this January - she failed the test shortly afterwards.
As an aside she was apparently taking this drug for years, while it wasn't banned - I always find it strange how many sportsmen/women are taking so many drugs for "legitimate health reasons". What with being world class atheletes and all that they seem to be a pretty "sick" bunch.Comment
-
I've reviewed this case in detail, taken advice from medical and legal professionals and considered the impact on the sport as a whole and I've come to the conclusion she should be let off because she's fit.
HTHLast edited by northernladuk; 8 March 2016, 18:20.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Bloody hell, a fan of pubescant girlie popstars, which one are you:Originally posted by AtW View PostAye.
Lots of photos of people I don't recognise but are presumably popstars...


“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Yesterday 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Yesterday 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41
- A remote IT contractor's allowable expenses: 10 must-claims in 2026 Jan 16 07:03
- New UK crypto rules now apply. Here’s how mandatory reporting affects contractors Jan 15 07:03
- What the Ray McCann Loan Charge Review means for contractors Jan 14 06:21
- IT contractor demand defied seasonal slump in December 2025 Jan 13 07:10
- Five tax return hacks for contractors as Jan 31st looms Jan 12 07:45

Comment