- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Damn Sharapova ...
Collapse
X
-
-
It wasn't retrospectively banned - the final decision was made last September and the ban took effect this January - she failed the test shortly afterwards.Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostSounds hard done by to me.
She's been taking something which wasn't banned for ten years. They decide to retrospectively ban it, she doesn't realize and gets caught.
Sounds like HMRC to meComment
-
Don't confuse MF with fact and reality - you know that's not his strongest area.Originally posted by centurian View PostIt wasn't retrospectively banned - the final decision was made last September and the ban took effect this January - she failed the test shortly afterwards.
As an aside she was apparently taking this drug for years, while it wasn't banned - I always find it strange how many sportsmen/women are taking so many drugs for "legitimate health reasons". What with being world class atheletes and all that they seem to be a pretty "sick" bunch.Comment
-
I've reviewed this case in detail, taken advice from medical and legal professionals and considered the impact on the sport as a whole and I've come to the conclusion she should be let off because she's fit.
HTHLast edited by northernladuk; 8 March 2016, 18:20.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
Bloody hell, a fan of pubescant girlie popstars, which one are you:Originally posted by AtW View PostAye.
Lots of photos of people I don't recognise but are presumably popstars...


“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment