- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Exam Grades not comparable to 50 years ago
Collapse
X
-
-
Not even those. It's higher up than that.Originally posted by gables View PostYes, those that set the curriculum, teach it and set the exams
Wanting a system where everyone is at least of a certain standard is all well and good but some kids are just plain thick and you also stifle the elite by concentrating on making sure that your F and U grade students get up to an E or D. 100 IQ is the average for a reason. For all the bright people out there, there has to be a bell-curve distribution of people balancing them out. Others may simply not have the aptitude for exams.
We're crying out for skilled tradespeople but Bliar and Brown insisted that a high percentage should go to uni. On balance, the Tories upgraded polytechnics to universities, diluting the quality of graduates by default. While some employers may recognise the traditional red bricks, others just see a graduate then moan that Dave and his two E grade A-levels in media and sports science isn't up to the job.
We're sorting people later in life, at which point we've already invested too much money in their failed education when they could already have been showing promise as an apprentice. You shouldn't be allowed to college without 5 A-Cs; YTS should be re-introduced for those who are ambitious but not as smart to give the a vocational qualification of some sort.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Way better said than I could, I'll admit my answer was lazy.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostNot even those. It's higher up than that.
Wanting a system where everyone is at least of a certain standard is all well and good but some kids are just plain thick and you also stifle the elite by concentrating on making sure that your F and U grade students get up to an E or D. 100 IQ is the average for a reason. For all the bright people out there, there has to be a bell-curve distribution of people balancing them out. Others may simply not have the aptitude for exams.
We're crying out for skilled tradespeople but Bliar and Brown insisted that a high percentage should go to uni. On balance, the Tories upgraded polytechnics to universities, diluting the quality of graduates by default. While some employers may recognise the traditional red bricks, others just see a graduate then moan that Dave and his two E grade A-levels in media and sports science isn't up to the job.
We're sorting people later in life, at which point we've already invested too much money in their failed education when they could already have been showing promise as an apprentice. You shouldn't be allowed to college without 5 A-Cs; YTS should be re-introduced for those who are ambitious but not as smart to give the a vocational qualification of some sort.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment