- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Google boss doesn't know what his salary is
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by PurpleGorilla; 15 February 2016, 12:55. -
Comment
-
Good point. Touché!Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostGovernment debt of £1.56 trillion or 81.58% of GDP - under normal business rules HMG Ltd would have been struck off as Directors long ago
Comment
-
That may be the case but if I invest in something I want a return. The government demands a return under the tax structures for doing nothing whereas the investor puts their money at risk in the corporation in question.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostIMHO, that is a big part of the problem with modern capitalism.
Under extreme situations, there might be a case for the government to step in and dictate that jobs come before shareholders because the country cannot afford so many people on the dole but that would have to be an extreme situation and would affect all employers. We could actually have nearly 100% employment if shareholders didn't come first.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
Theoretically you could, its called Socialism where everyone is employed by, and is thus a shareholder in the stateOriginally posted by LondonManc View Post
Under extreme situations, there might be a case for the government to step in and dictate that jobs come before shareholders because the country cannot afford so many people on the dole but that would have to be an extreme situation and would affect all employers. We could actually have nearly 100% employment if shareholders didn't come first.
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”Comment
-
But if you can't answer a common knowledge question of how much you get paid - you come across as a Marie Antoinette.Originally posted by LondonManc View PostThat may be the case but if I invest in something I want a return. The government demands a return under the tax structures for doing nothing whereas the investor puts their money at risk in the corporation in question.
Under extreme situations, there might be a case for the government to step in and dictate that jobs come before shareholders because the country cannot afford so many people on the dole but that would have to be an extreme situation and would affect all employers. We could actually have nearly 100% employment if shareholders didn't come first.
Comment
-
I think she struggled with taxation mainly. Apparently it went right over her head.Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostBut if you can't answer a common knowledge question of how much you get paid - you come across as a Marie Antoinette.The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't existComment
-
I think it was a case of 'wouldn't' rather than 'couldn't' and his hesitancy was probably attributable to him trying to think of a way to say '**** off and mind your own damn business' politelyOriginally posted by PurpleGorilla View PostBut if you can't answer a common knowledge question of how much you get paid - you come across as a Marie Antoinette.
Comment
-
Maybe Google is different - but I thought all annual accounts state directors remuneration?Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI think it was a case of 'wouldn't' rather than 'couldn't' and his hesitancy was probably attributable to him trying to think of a way to say '**** off and mind your own damn business' politely
So if it is public knowledge just answer the question. Or you look like a tosser.Comment
-
The guy needs more media training.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI think it was a case of 'wouldn't' rather than 'couldn't' and his hesitancy was probably attributable to him trying to think of a way to say '**** off and mind your own damn business' politely
"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Loan Recall Case Study: Amanda Today 06:00
- How IR35 inflated an £8.5bn consultancy bill — and tests Burnham at the Budget Aug 28 07:47
- Autumn Budget 2026: FCSA’s 5 contractor asks of John Healey Aug 27 04:15
- Andy Burnham's Zoom gripe doesn’t apply to IT contractors, say recruiters Aug 26 03:41
- Check your Loan Recall paperwork for the Isle of Man: it could matter Aug 25 03:27
- Budget 2026: Contractor advisers ask for ‘IR35 reset’ Aug 24 04:57
- Why might an umbrella company fail to pay its total tax bill to HMRC? Aug 18 06:08
- Contractors, here are the late payment fixes that the Lords just turned down Aug 17 08:03
- How will HMRC's Direct Debit plan affect contractors paying VAT and PAYE? Aug 13 23:54
- HMRC's new 'reckless' tax offence: an IR35 game-changer for contractors? Aug 13 13:50





Comment