Originally posted by d000hg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
And the good news is
Collapse
X
-
Which was my point. I think they'd have preferred to capture him, but that isn't always possible. Your point appeared to be "I bet they wanted to kill him and never intended to try to capture him". -
I bet Cherie Blair is gutted...Originally posted by Uncle Albert View PostThe trouble with capturing them alive is what the hell you do with them then? It's much easier to kill them and be done with it rather than spend millions on trials and incarceration of someone who would be seen as a hero to the rest of the Jihadis.
.First Law of Contracting: Only the strong surviveComment
-
I'm not asserting it, I'm wondering it. It seems either it was deliberate, or the op was botched. But there is a lot of "revenge spirit" around right now - understandably of course.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
They did disable him though ...Originally posted by zeitghosttrying to shoot to disable was out of the question.
Comment
-
When dealing with those who wear suicide vests it becomes imperative to "disable" them permanently before they do any more harm to others.Originally posted by d000hg View PostI'm not asserting it, I'm wondering it. It seems either it was deliberate, or the op was botched. But there is a lot of "revenge spirit" around right now - understandably of course.Comment
-
Are those the only two options you can think of? Is it not remotely possible that the terrorists, fully aware that they were at the top of the wanted list in Paris, have spent the last 6 nights preparing for a full on assault on whoever turned up to try to capture them and were prepared to take anyone out who tried?Originally posted by d000hg View PostI'm not asserting it, I'm wondering it. It seems either it was deliberate, or the op was botched. But there is a lot of "revenge spirit" around right now - understandably of course.Comment
-
A part of me hopes that he is still alive and they've only said he's dead to prevent the likes of Cherie Blair sticking her oar in. Hopefully he's in a very dark place suffering all sorts of hell as the authorities try to get information from him. When they're done, they can throw in in the sea.
Terrorists do not respect the Geneva Convention, they do not follow the rules of war. They target innocents at work and at play. They should have no expectation that we will play nicely with them.Comment
-
Probably, but they are hardly trained to anywhere near the same level.Originally posted by meridian View PostAre those the only two options you can think of? Is it not remotely possible that the terrorists, fully aware that they were at the top of the wanted list in Paris, have spent the last 6 nights preparing for a full on assault on whoever turned up to try to capture them and were prepared to take anyone out who tried?
I'll say again - if a highly trained SWAT team comes through your door without you having prior warning, you do not have time to make a decision whether to fight. It's over before you even realise what's happening.
They train to avoid getting into an actual fire-fight in the first place.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
-
I believe they did try the element of surprise, flash bang on their door, but it turned out the door was reinforced and then they blocked it with something more once they realised what was happening.Originally posted by d000hg View PostProbably, but they are hardly trained to anywhere near the same level.
I'll say again - if a highly trained SWAT team comes through your door without you having prior warning, you do not have time to make a decision whether to fight. It's over before you even realise what's happening.
They train to avoid getting into an actual fire-fight in the first place.
After which all hell broke lose and at that point, trying to arrest someone in that room is nearly impossible
I also read (probably the guardian) that the police did ask that Hasna character where her boyfriend was, and she replied he isn't my boyfriend and then blew herself up.Comment
-
InterestingOriginally posted by jbond007 View PostI believe they did try the element of surprise, flash bang on their door, but it turned out the door was reinforced and then they blocked it with something more once they realised what was happening.
Yes, absolutely. Once you're in a fire-fight you have very few options.After which all hell broke lose and at that point, trying to arrest someone in that room is nearly impossibleOriginally posted by MaryPoppinsI'd still not breastfeed a naziOriginally posted by vetranUrine is quite nourishingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Today 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment