• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Just to cheer up BP

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    Indeed. But this is BP, I'm worried.
    I think you are confusing me with someone else. I have always fought for the rights of children.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by d000hg View Post
      Indeed. But this is BP, I'm worried.
      New Wife, New life ........
      Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
        For longer marriages the contribution is not measured in simple financial terms, but also takes into account mutual support, running the household, child care etc. It would be, in my view, morally wrong to not take these things into account. Part of marriage is giving up your singleness and all that entails for and to the other person - that must be quantified. You can't go back to the state you were in before the marriage, because you did get married - nobody forced you.
        I agree that this is the only fair way for longer marriages. (Long enough the children have all grown up). It should be an exactly even split.

        For shorter marriages it is different. Treating them the same is where problems come in. Eg the wife gets half of a millionaire's fortune, that he accumulated before they ever met. Or half the house he owned outright before they ever met. There is first the problem of the unfairness, then the unforeseen consequence which is that divorce starts to become an attractive option for some people.

        Also I believe the govt. should make divorce more difficult, not more attractive for one party. It should offer help to couples and do everything it can to keep 'em together wherever remotely possible. Where divorce does happen, it should enforce fathers' visitation rights (which are routinely flouted) with hard punishments. Children need fathers. And mothers.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by vetran View Post
          New year, New Wife, New life ........
          FTFY

          Comment


            #15
            This made me laugh


            http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...4952483026.jpg
            Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
              Utterly appalling. After divorce it is reasonable that partners should get their share of what they contributed to the couple's wealth or otherwise be put back into the situation they would probably have been in had they not married. Anything more is wrong in principal.

              The law is an idiot. These women have gone off and should get down to the gym and get a job.
              FTFY
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment

              Working...
              X