• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why is software so rubbish?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DaveB
    Every other peice of music management software I've used, including Media Player, *shudder*, has taken the music files from wherever they are and given you the option to organise them by genre, artist, album, title etc in any combination. The issue with iTunes is that you dont get this, all it does is stuff all the tracks together in alphabetical order making it impossible to select a specific album or a specific artist quickly and easily when you want to.

    Music Match is still the best music app I've used and one of the few I paid for.
    There is a reason it does that actually. It's in that format for your iPod, which has a very optimised filesystem for small devices. No processing is required to load the iPod files and the iPod doesn't have to know about directory entries etc. It is very well thought out if you use the abstraction and not the data store directly (which is my point).

    Same reason in unit testing - you test the public interface, not the implementation because it's all that matters.

    I get the feeling a lot of people on here really are missing the target when it comes to software.
    Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by TheMonkey
      There is a reason it does that actually. It's in that format for your iPod, which has a very optimised filesystem for small devices. No processing is required to load the iPod files and the iPod doesn't have to know about directory entries etc. It is very well thought out if you use the abstraction and not the data store directly (which is my point).

      Same reason in unit testing - you test the public interface, not the implementation because it's all that matters.

      I get the feeling a lot of people on here really are missing the target when it comes to software.

      I dont have an iPod. If I did I want to be able to select tracks by the criteria I mentioned before and download them to it. This is what I do with the Mp3 player I do have and it all works very nicely.

      My son does have an iPod and he doesn't use iTunes either for exactly the same reasons.
      "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by DaveB
        I dont have an iPod. If I did I want to be able to select tracks by the criteria I mentioned before and download them to it. This is what I do with the Mp3 player I do have and it all works very nicely.

        My son does have an iPod and he doesn't use iTunes either for exactly the same reasons.
        Well a) Why the hell are you using iTunes? b) Why the hell is he using an iPod?
        Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by TheMonkey
          Well a) Why the hell are you using iTunes? b) Why the hell is he using an iPod?
          A) I'm not.

          B) The same reason everyone else is using one. They are "cool".
          "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by DaveB
            A) I'm not.

            B) The same reason everyone else is using one. They are "cool".
            a) well why the hell are you moaning?

            b) They're only cool because they work. I bought mine because it works flawlessly and I don't have to worry about things not working (like most other players and particularly windows itself).
            Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by TheMonkey
              a) well why the hell are you moaning?

              b) They're only cool because they work. I bought mine because it works flawlessly and I don't have to worry about things not working (like most other players and particularly windows itself).
              I'm not moaning, I'm pointing out the reasons Apple lost out in my choice of Music software which was relevent to the topic of the thread anyway.

              So the only thing it has to do to be cool is work? My Mp3 player is a crappy £12.99 usb jobby from Woolworths. No-one in their right mind would describe it as cool but it works...
              "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

              Comment


                #27
                It should be pointed out that you don't need iTunes to use an iPod, so if your son doesn't like iTunes it's perfectly possible to use something else (though probably not if he's been downloading the DRM encumbered stuff from the iTunes music store - but then the blame for that goes to the recording industry not Apple).
                Listen to my last album on Spotify

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Cowboy Bob
                  It should be pointed out that you don't need iTunes to use an iPod, so if your son doesn't like iTunes it's perfectly possible to use something else (though probably not if he's been downloading the DRM encumbered stuff from the iTunes music store - but then the blame for that goes to the recording industry not Apple).

                  As I said, he has an iPod but doesn't use iTunes. His music comes from the usual sources...
                  "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Why is software bad?

                    Over on Business / Contracts there is a request for an Oracle DBA to install software and train staff in Oracle DBA funstions. It is for "a day or two".

                    There is the reason: people who plan and buy IT think there's nothing to it.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      I hate crap user interfaces and crap instructions, designed and written by developers with personality disorders for fuck-knows-who.

                      I've been asked to write guides for using dialogs that have unlabelled fields. And sometimes fields on the same dialog box with duplicate names.

                      I've had to use text fields that don't let you move your cursor to edit your content - you have to delete it from the end back to the point where you want to edit, then type it all out again (step forward BT-Yahoo for your Technical Enquiry form).

                      And I've had to follow step-by-step instructions where each step is 100 words long in which you have to read the life story of the action in order to work out what it is - often just "Click OK" or similar. And sometimes there isn't an action in there at all - despite it being a numbered 'step' - it is just the life story of some part of the system that nobody gives a sh1t about.

                      And instructions in the wrong order - for example, how to create a boot disk where the last step is "Don't forget to insert a blank disk before you start". I found one of those recently.

                      A lot of this crap is in home-brew or beta software, but much is publicly available, like the BT-Yahoo example above, and crap navigation like MacAfee's webtulipe.
                      Last edited by wendigo100; 5 October 2006, 07:33.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X