Global Warming is costing lives

[AtW]

A conspiracy theory can be correct. You seem to be implying one can't.

Your conspiracy theory about that scientist is exactly the what made name for "conspiracy theories", by loons for loons.

It's got nothing to do with expected obstruction of justice in the Govt to cover up multiple crimes they commit, that does not qualify as conspiracy.

[ZARDOZ]

Not all conspiracy theories are by "loons". Some have turned out to be true. The more fanciful ones should not be a reason to dismiss the ones which have credibility

Although the term "conspiracy theory" has acquired a derogatory meaning over time and is often used to dismiss or ridicule beliefs in conspiracies, it has also continued to be used by some to refer to actual, proven conspiracies, such as U.S. President Richard Nixon and his aides conspiring to cover up Watergate.

[AtW]

Although the term "conspiracy theory" has acquired a derogatory meaning over time and is often used to dismiss or ridicule beliefs in conspiracies, it has also continued to be used by some to refer to actual, proven conspiracies, such as U.S. President Richard Nixon and his aides conspiring to cover up Watergate.

You really are stupid Zardoz.

[AtW]

Read this again -

Probability of somebody in Govt engaging in illegal activity for their personal gain/pleasure - 99.99999%

Probability of some unknown scientist (that conspiracy theories loons rarely even name) inventing a totally new non-fossil fuel and being killed by evil fossil fuel corporations - 0.00001%

So one is dead certainty, and the other one is "a conspiracy theory" by loons for loons.

HTH

[ZARDOZ]

You've misundertood the whole thing, never mind

[AtW]

You've misundertood the whole thing, never mind