• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

One tax that won't happen

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I'll give it about as much chance as MPs introducing an MPs second home tax
    Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

    No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      If they brought back public information films you are less likely to get:
      1. Cyclists riding without lights and wearing dark clothes at night
      2. Pedestrians walking out randomly into the road in London
      3. Teenagers playing on railway lines
      4. People using headphones/selfie-sticks when they hear a storm when they are the highest point

      Then again....
      And ...

      Sir Isaac Newton told us why
      An apple falls down from the sky
      And from this fact, it's very plain,
      All other objects do the same
      A brick, a bolt, a bar, a cup,
      Invariably fall down, not up
      And every common working tool
      Is governed by the self-same rule
      So when you handle tools up there,
      Let your watchword be, "Take Care!"
      If at work, you drop a spanner,
      It travels in a downward manner
      At work, a fifth of accidents or more,
      Illustrate old Newton's law
      But one thing he forgot to add,
      The damage won't be half as bad
      If you are wearing proper clothes,
      Especially on your head and toes
      These hats and shoes are there to save
      The wearer from an early grave
      So best feet forward and take care
      About the kind of shoes you wear
      It's better to be sure, than dead,
      So get a hat and keep your head

      Don't think to go without is brave;
      The effects of gravity can be grave.
      I'm not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief, is positively harmful. [Christopher Hitchens]

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by cojak View Post
        I would imagine that soft drink lobbyists will kick this one into touch.

        Tax sugary drinks by 20%, say doctors - BBC News
        It's ok the first £5000 worth of drinks would be tax free, see your government is doing you a big favour there

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by d000hg View Post
          Yes it is shocking that you have to be forced to do this.
          What percentage of your net income do you donate to charity? There's a lot of need in the world.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by d000hg View Post
            Like this, you mean:...
            No, I meant public information films, and specifically NOT the change4life program. Change4life is sponsored by the junk food industry which therefore has a strong influence over its output.

            Private Eye Change4Life Story Photo by Sup3rt3d | Photobucket

            Interestingly, the fact that Change4life is sponsored by junk food behemoths isn't mentioned on the Change4life web site, or its Wikipedia entry. But the info is here: business4Life

            Since that Eye article was written (about a year ago IIRC), it is encouraging to see that Change4life is at least now telling people not to each some junk foods. At home. In a sort of gentle, non specific way.

            Comment


              #16
              The body needs a set amount of carbs, sugars, protein, salts and fats on a daily basis. It is perfectly acceptable for someone who has basic knowledge of this and the ability to count to supplement these in variety of manners, including sugar in drinks.

              Taxing these does not address the real problem in that we have a whole layer of society that after 11 years in what is supposedly a great education system cannot count or understand basic nutritional information.

              The term junk food is misleading, there is no such thing, only junk diets.

              I also note that this weeks BMJ ( the public orifice of the BMA ) has an article on whether or not doctors should recommend homeopathy. I mean seriously?
              Last edited by minestrone; 18 July 2015, 16:06.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by unixman View Post
                Sometimes I think they should bring back public information films. If you are old enough to remember, these were short commercials on TV that gave basic advice and education on common sense subjects. Eg learning to swim, what to do if your clothes catch fire, how to avoid being pick pocketed, following the country code, what to do if you see a boat or swimmer in difficulty at sea. You might laugh but they offered basic information of just the type we need now.
                Yes they were excellent. Coincidentally one of my Swiss colleagues was talking about a scythe sharpening accident just yesterday and I told them about the public information film I'd watched as a kid covering exactly that topic.

                I can't remember what the film's advice was, but my Swiss colleagues suggested that the passengers on the passing train should pull the emergency cord and give him assistance.

                I can't find the Reginald Molehusband parking one on Youtube. It used to be there.

                Originally posted by unixman View Post
                You would think people would automatically know that white bread and sugery pop are bad, but it seems not.
                I'm not too sure about that. We knew that stuff all along but do the younguns today know it?

                Originally posted by unixman View Post
                Show them a few public information films on their 48 inch TVs, sorted.
                Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                Comment


                  #18
                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stz5qhQf-GE

                  ...
                  "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by zeitghost
                    Indeed.

                    A few showings of "Clunk Click Every Trip" and "Let the train take the strain" should sort 'em out in short order.
                    Wrong thread...
                    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
                      The body needs a set amount of carbs, sugars, protein, salts and fats on a daily basis. It is perfectly acceptable for someone who has basic knowledge of this and the ability to count to supplement these in variety of manners, including sugar in drinks.

                      Taxing these does not address the real problem in that we have a whole layer of society that after 11 years in what is supposedly a great education system cannot count or understand basic nutritional information.
                      You read my mind.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X