What's the deal here guys?

[DimPrawn]

Banning IP addresses never really worked after about 1992, and now that much web browsing is done on mobile devices that get a different IP address every time they're pulled out of a pocket, it doesn't work even more

I stopped taking an interest in these things in 1991.

[TheFaQQer]

No we haven't.

He can't even stay flounced after writing something borderline illegal and stating he wouldn't ever come back after being pulled up for it.
Liar to the core, but that's no news.

To be fair, there was nothing borderline about it.

[TheFaQQer]

Banning IP addresses never really worked after about 1992, and now that much web browsing is done on mobile devices that get a different IP address every time they're pulled out of a pocket, it doesn't work even more

Think of that lovely collateral damage that could be done by blocking an IP address

[EternalOptimist]

Think of that lovely collateral damage that could be done by blocking an IP address

Imagine jumping into the sewer, or a cess pit every time you wanted to do a turd.
Much better to sit on a nice clean seat and be separated from the ordure by a U-Bend.
The same with the idea of blocking. It would have been much cleaner if the architects had started by blocking everyone and you had to specifically unblock the people you wanted to

[MarillionFan]

Nah. He's going to get banned within a week of today. Mark my words.

[suityou01]

Well if you were talking about Fat Lazy Chunt, then hats off.

[TykeMerc]

OK I thought it was too good to be true.

Better lock the account to be sure.

Tarra.

Well that flounce lasted an entire week or so then back to the victim posting. Too good to be true indeed.

Liar to the core as pointed out previously.