Originally posted by tractor
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The CUK jury decide - guilty or not?
Collapse
X
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostGuilty of driving without due care and attention.
10:15 at night in March isn't pitch black so would still be light and a person is big enough for you to see, mitigating circumstances are if I see an animal in the road and can't stop in time I hit it, sorry but swerving etc. to avoid an animal only puts you and other road users at risk. Also the druck has to take some of the blame tooComment
-
No one ever drives with full attention 100% of the time during their entire driving life. The best of us might get close, but it's not realistic to expect 100% 100% of the time.
With that being the case, even though it sounds as though she may have been at fault, it seems an injustice to prosecute her for running over some numpty sleeping in the middle of the road.Comment
-
...
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostJake the peg.
Funny thing is my doctor said it was unusual that one of my eyes was far bigger than the other two.Comment
-
...
Originally posted by Bacchus View Posthow many feet do you have?????Comment
-
Originally posted by MyUserName View PostThat is a fair point, however other drivers had seen him and stopped to sort it out so when they compare her driving to theirs she is going to seem guilty. I cannot say for sure but I would think that if I saw something 100 metres ahead on the road I would begin slowing down just in case it is something dangerous.himIT and stopped after they passedhimIT , they weren't aware it was a man and thought it was an obstruction.
I have some sympathy for her.Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
Originally posted by vetran View Postother drivers sawhimIT and stopped after they passedhimIT , they weren't aware it was a man and thought it was an obstruction.
I have some sympathy for her.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment