• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Official General Election Thread 2015

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Batcher View Post
    TIA !!!
    My son is going to Uni next year. I need you to pay for his education and his prescription hangover cures and my business rates and my domestic rates freeze etc. Get out there and place some contractors and get your fair share of tax paid please
    When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....

    Comment


      #12
      My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

      Comment


        #13
        Yes,it could be like Major

        The Sun's headline today was just weak.

        There are so many reasons to keep Milliband away from power, but it's pathetic to pick on him looking silly eating a sarnie.

        If I wanted to bet on the outcome, I'd see UKIP as people who want a more right wing tory government and although they're quite happy to say they'll vote UKIP in order to get the tories to move right, they really don't want a Labour/SNP coalition and so on the day will vote tactically.

        Of course that's too long for a Sun headline
        My 12 year old is walking 26 miles for Cardiac Risk in the Young, you can sponsor him here

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Dominic Connor View Post
          The Sun's headline today was just weak.

          There are so many reasons to keep Milliband away from power, but it's pathetic to pick on him looking silly eating a sarnie.

          If I wanted to bet on the outcome, I'd see UKIP as people who want a more right wing tory government and although they're quite happy to say they'll vote UKIP in order to get the tories to move right, they really don't want a Labour/SNP coalition and so on the day will vote tactically.

          Of course that's too long for a Sun headline
          I wondered what you were on about but, of course, you are looking at the English version of the Sun. The Scottish version is all about supporting the SNP

          Comment


            #15
            Bright Green!

            https://www.timeshighereducation.co....019783.article
            My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by TestMangler View Post
              My son is going to Uni next year. I need you to pay for his education and his prescription hangover cures and my business rates and my domestic rates freeze etc. Get out there and place some contractors and get your fair share of tax paid please
              It would be nice if they could buy a 2 bedroom semi too so they will be hit by the mansion tax. We could do with some more nurses

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Batcher View Post
                You've convinced me to vote SNP
                Well, yes probably I have. To be offered more government spending in Scotland without Scots having to pay for it is a good offer that I would not know how to argue against.

                The mansion tax could easily be set at a level to hit many English homes, but few Scottish ones, the Scottish NHS could have loads of money hosed at it and of course there is Trident...

                Leaving aside whether nukes are good or not, there is the issue that UK nuclear bases employ a lot of people in areas where there isn't much work. Ironically, it would be cheaper for rump UK if it didn't have to pay for the base, but given that a UK-Scotland would be more tory there is zero chance of giving up the nukes, which then will need a base which simply can't be built quickly (at least 5, maybe 10 years)

                But the French and Americans could bid to host them and shared resources are much cheaper for a small nuclear force like the UKs.

                But what about the workers ?
                Given that the bases are built, most of the ongoing cost is people, ironically mostly SNP voters.

                So to make the removal of nukes from Scotland politically palatable the SNP will need to bully Labour into serious job creation in that area. We're talking 10-15,000 jobs created directly or indirectly, easy to do, just not cheap. They can pay Google to create big data centres there, but that would not be nearly enough and the bribe would have to be big enough to counter the fact that the SNP want to be harsh on multinationals who dodge tax, which may be good, but isn't attractive to them.

                The old standby of putting a government department there (like the DVLC in Swansea, or the DSS in the North) can't work because they want out of the UK, so bribing a Google, Lenovo or Boeing is the only game, not cheap at all.
                My 12 year old is walking 26 miles for Cardiac Risk in the Young, you can sponsor him here

                Comment


                  #18
                  Hung parliament

                  Well ?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Dominic Connor View Post
                    Well, yes probably I have. To be offered more government spending in Scotland without Scots having to pay for it is a good offer that I would not know how to argue against.

                    The mansion tax could easily be set at a level to hit many English homes, but few Scottish ones, the Scottish NHS could have loads of money hosed at it and of course there is Trident...

                    Leaving aside whether nukes are good or not, there is the issue that UK nuclear bases employ a lot of people in areas where there isn't much work. Ironically, it would be cheaper for rump UK if it didn't have to pay for the base, but given that a UK-Scotland would be more tory there is zero chance of giving up the nukes, which then will need a base which simply can't be built quickly (at least 5, maybe 10 years)

                    But the French and Americans could bid to host them and shared resources are much cheaper for a small nuclear force like the UKs.

                    But what about the workers ?
                    Given that the bases are built, most of the ongoing cost is people, ironically mostly SNP voters.

                    So to make the removal of nukes from Scotland politically palatable the SNP will need to bully Labour into serious job creation in that area. We're talking 10-15,000 jobs created directly or indirectly, easy to do, just not cheap. They can pay Google to create big data centres there, but that would not be nearly enough and the bribe would have to be big enough to counter the fact that the SNP want to be harsh on multinationals who dodge tax, which may be good, but isn't attractive to them.

                    The old standby of putting a government department there (like the DVLC in Swansea, or the DSS in the North) can't work because they want out of the UK, so bribing a Google, Lenovo or Boeing is the only game, not cheap at all.
                    A FOI request to the MOD revealed only 520 jobs are dependent on Trident in Scotland.

                    Ministry of Defence reveals just 520 Faslane jobs depend on Trident | Nuclear Information Service

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X