• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

So who on CUK is voting Tory?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by MercladUK View Post
    how about at least 34% of the voting public.
    The Tories are the party of the rich certainly they are. they are also the party of the aspiring classes and the well educated. They want more people to fall into this category.
    Labour are the party of the poor. They also represent the not so poor who aspire only to suppressing aspiration amongst those around them. It serves labour well to broaden their church and make more people poor. So yes the Torys are the party of the rich and yes labour are the party of the poor.

    If you want evidence then just look at every area in the country that is under labour control It has always been poor under labour and will always remain poor under labour.
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      "I'll cut net migration to 100000 - no ifs, no buts" - David Cameron, 2010

      Instead of which, net migration has grown by 100000. Tell me where this government wins on immigration?
      They were idiots for saying that. The real blame lies with labour and its open door policies thanks to Blair agreeing the Lisbon treaty. Furthermore the utter incompetence of the border controls agency (in true public services style) let anyone in .
      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
        "I'll cut net migration to 100000 - no ifs, no buts" - David Cameron, 2010
        That really annoyed me. I broadly support them, and in a way quite like Cameron (at least compared to the likes of Blair), but why on earth did they think saying such an unbelievably stupid thing as that was a good idea.

        The best way to stop immigration is to ruin our economy so nobody wants to come here any more. So if you really want to stop immigration vote Labour. Or better yet, UKIP.
        Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
          They were idiots for saying that. The real blame lies with labour and its open door policies thanks to Blair agreeing the Lisbon treaty. Furthermore the utter incompetence of the border controls agency (in true public services style) let anyone in .
          Wasn't it John Major who signed us up to what is now the EU which included freedom of movement as a core principle?
          Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
            Wasn't it John Major who signed us up to what is now the EU which included freedom of movement as a core principle?
            You are right. It began with Maastricht and was sealed by the Lisbon treaty. However Major had not reckoned for eastern europe to be included whereas labour did and had every opportunity to block the Lisbon treaty. Instead they decided to underestimate the numbers of immigrants that would come here
            Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
              You are right. It began with Maastricht and was sealed by the Lisbon treaty. However Major had not reckoned for eastern europe to be included whereas labour did and had every opportunity to block the Lisbon treaty. Instead they decided to underestimate the numbers of immigrants that would come here
              Plus they were racist and assumed any immigrants would vote Labour
              Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

              No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                It's 900000 less than Labour would have bought in.
                And the factual basis for your statement is what exactly?
                Best Forum Advisor 2014
                Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                  They were idiots for saying that. The real blame lies with labour and its open door policies thanks to Blair agreeing the Lisbon treaty. Furthermore the utter incompetence of the border controls agency (in true public services style) let anyone in .
                  Doesn't Border Force (there's no such thing as the border controls agency) report to Theresa May?

                  Net migration increased more under the Tories than anyone considered possible, and yet you really think that they are strong on immigration?
                  Best Forum Advisor 2014
                  Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
                  Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                    You are right. It began with Maastricht and was sealed by the Lisbon treaty. However Major had not reckoned for eastern europe to be included whereas labour did and had every opportunity to block the Lisbon treaty. Instead they decided to underestimate the numbers of immigrants that would come here
                    Correct me if I'm wrong, but the EU allowed restrictions on the number of immigrants from the East European countries for 6 years but Labour decided not to implement them (along with Ireland and Sweden IIRC). With much more limited options that of course meant more came to the UK. Kippers like to say that the EU forced the wave of East European immigrants on us, but actually it was a decision made by our own democratically elected government and most of the EU didn't allow unrestricted immigration from those countries.
                    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
                      Doesn't Border Force (there's no such thing as the border controls agency) report to Theresa May?

                      Net migration increased more under the Tories than anyone considered possible, and yet you really think that they are strong on immigration?
                      I dont think the Tories are strong on immigration. The border force agency (or whatever it is called) was part of the dysfunctional set of public services that Teresa may inherited
                      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X