• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Why BTL will never fail in the UK

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by alluvial View Post
    Yes, 0.5% doesn't sound like much does it?
    Or we could say, approx. 6% of the population of Scotland, 10% of the population of Wales, or 16% of the population of Northern Ireland. Sounds a tad higher then.

    Or how about twice the population of Brighton? Or a tad under the population of Cardiff?

    Or even, nearly 8 times the population of the county that I live in?

    Sounds a bit bigger then doesn't it?

    Thing is, you can convert any number to a percentage of something else to make it fit in with your own viewpoint but all that happens is that, whilst you get a slap on the back from the other left wing "let them all come and be given succour" types for showing things as they "really are", you actually just make yourself seem just a little bit of a tit.
    It's not to fit to any viewpoint, the relevant statistic is net migration to the UK so the comparison is against existing UK population. Not the population of Wales, the number of girls who have laughed at your penis, or the number of pens you can stick up your nose at once.

    % growth is the important metric, not absolute numbers. If all the immigrants move to the same town, that is relevant. Just as it would be if all the emigrants left the same town.
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
      MigrationWatchUK | Latest Immigration Statistics

      Notice the highest immigration ever under our "tough on immigration" Tory overlords.
      We can't be that far off a big epidemic all the signs are there for large transmission:

      Mass immigration
      Overcrowding in cities
      Disease resistance to vaccines/ Re-emergence of diseases presumed to be controlled

      It's going to happen just a question of when and how big

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Flashman View Post
        We live in a country where people move to France for the quality of life! I wonder if the fact that France has 105 people per km whereas England has 419 people per km has anything to do with it?
        Or perhaps it's the wine, the cheese, the warmer weather, etc... people have been moving to France for decades. If you want to live in the quiet countryside in the UK, you are spoilt for choice. So many exceeding beautiful areas.

        Originally posted by minestrone View Post
        he is wanting to renegotiate open borders with he EU then have a vote.

        It is a reasonably sensible approach to the problem.
        Originally posted by Avalonia View Post
        This will NEVER happen
        Why? Everything is up for negotiation, if you have something the other side wants. The EU doesn't want the UK to leave... look how much fuss they are making about Greece leaving and they are useless.
        Originally posted by MaryPoppins
        I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
        Originally posted by vetran
        Urine is quite nourishing

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by stek View Post
          My dad once told me you could fit all the people in the world on the Isle of Wight and still have room to spare.

          Mind you, he also assured me spaghetti was made from worms....
          You shouldn't believe him
          The Isle of Wight is 380 square kilometers which is 380,000,000 square meters
          Assuming that there are 7 billion people (It may already be 8 billion or more) and they all would need 1 square meter each, you're 6.62 billion square meters short (or 17.4 Isle of Wights)

          BTW the smell would be horrendous 3 people dying every second and all the human excrements accumulating
          Last edited by Eirikur; 14 April 2015, 11:53.

          Comment


            #25
            The only way we could get concessions is if we threatened to leave and meant it. Dave and his fellow ' conservatives ' are hopeless Europhiles . He will fail

            Comment


              #26
              Why do they need 1 square meter each? I reckon you could cram people into 1/8 of a square metre on average... 2 billion Asians are on average pretty small and kids are too - or could be held by parents.

              We only need 2 IoW.
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                Why do they need 1 square meter each? I reckon you could cram people into 1/8 of a square metre
                Or one FatLazyContractor per 4 sqm

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
                  Or one FatLazyContractor per 4 sqm
                  But people can stand on top, like a bouncy castle of sorts.
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
                    You shouldn't believe him
                    The Isle of Wight is 380 square kilometers which is 380,000,000 square meters
                    Assuming that there are 7 billion people (It may already be 8 billion or more) and they all would need 1 square meter each, you're 6.62 billion square meters short (or 17.4 Isle of Wights)

                    BTW the smell would be horrendous 3 people dying every second and all the human excrements accumulating
                    When stek's Dad said it, before we were all hyper-morbidly obese, adults needed 2 square feet, and toddlers less. 1 square metre contains 10.764 square feat, or 5.382 people, so we could squeeze in just over 2 billion, the world population in, er, 1927. Conclusion: Stek is old.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by unixman View Post
                      When stek's Dad said it, before we were all hyper-morbidly obese, adults needed 2 square feet, and toddlers less. 1 square metre contains 10.764 square feat, or 5.382 people, so we could squeeze in just over 2 billion, the world population in, er, 1927.
                      You've been to India and China? Or you're so provincially small-minded that to you westerners are all the people there are?
                      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                      Originally posted by vetran
                      Urine is quite nourishing

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X