- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Socialist tax efficiency
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostWhat's wrong with tax efficiency?
So a large portion of the bankroll of the Labour party can't be seen to be doing the same thing that Labour are calling foul towards large portions of the Tory party and their bankrollOriginally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostBecause HSBC has been showing people how to be legally tax efficient and have been getting hammered for it.
So a large portion of the bankroll of the Labour party can't be seen to be doing the same thing that Labour are calling foul towards large portions of the Tory party and their bankrollSocialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.Comment
-
Originally posted by MicrosoftBob View PostIt was more the collusion in tax evasion that got HSBC in trouble
So now being tax efficient is a dirty term thus the removal of these terms from UNITE's website.Comment
-
Originally posted by minestrone View PostBut the people Labour named were not tax evasive, they have been mudding the waters as usual between evasion and efficiency.
So now being tax efficient is a dirty term thus the removal of these terms from UNITE's website.Comment
-
The problem is that Labour are now hammering anyone who practices tax avoidance, not just tax evasion.
Forgetting that most people do it in one way or another, such as having a contributary pension, buying an ISA.
And this thread illustrates that Labour's voters are no exception, and their paymasters who practice it are embarrassed to admit it. Bloody hypocrits.Last edited by Doggy Styles; 13 February 2015, 23:02.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostTempted to share this on fb and await flak from militant socialist 'friend'"You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Labour chap on the radio yesterday says that the ISA argument is invalid, ISAs aren't tax avoidance because tax isn't charged on them.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The JSL nub for umbrellas/agencies: who runs PAYE and who will HMRC bill? Today 18:16
- How HMRC’s umbrella company JSL rules will play out Aug 13 23:33
- As Small Business Commissioner, I invite unpaid limited company contractors to come forward Aug 13 17:50
- Is Labour just going to leave limited company contracting zombie-like, neither dead nor alive? Aug 12 22:56
- Contracting Awards 2025 unveils ‘stellar’ shortlist Aug 11 21:31
- If it’s JSL liability, it’s Managed Service Providers (MSPs) too, potentially Aug 8 02:54
- Labour's new anti-late payment package ‘a contractor confidence boost’ Aug 7 00:33
- MSC test cases: Feb 2026 spells certainty for Boox/CK contractors Aug 6 05:36
- Under JSL, agencies are ‘umbrella companies’ if no brollies are present Aug 4 23:06
- How to get paid by a closed (or closing) recruitment agency Aug 4 17:37
Comment