Oil < $50 a Barrel. The Dirty Spekulant thread

[d000hg]

Think long-term. The beneficiaries of low oil prices could not be clearer.

Surely that relies on the dip/crash in oil prices being similarly long-term - if it's a blip then making trades based on market overreactions would be sensible.

[scooterscot]

Why would you not reveal it, you think a handful of other people knowing will have any effect on your results?

I would not expect so. I'm just not in the habit of giving up information for free.

[MarillionFan]

Yes, that suggestion will provoke me into revealing my strategy on the public forum. Seriously though, it's bleeding obvious. You'll kick yourself when you figure it out.

Yes, Airlines & Logistics companies. But I'm interested on which ones the panels think are the biggest winners.

[d000hg]

I would not expect so. I'm just a horrible human being

FTFY.

[DimPrawn]

Chip shops use a lot of oil, so going to buy some chips and hold on to them.

[suityou01]

Yes, Airlines & Logistics companies. But I'm interested on which ones the panels think are the biggest winners.

You've missed the opportunity to short AirAsia btw.

[d000hg]

Chip shops use a lot of oil, so going to buy some chips and hold on to them.

Watch out, MF may be after your investment.

[DannyF1966]

Think long-term. The beneficiaries of low oil prices could not be clearer.

You sound like a teacher who revels in making his class feel stupid.

[scooterscot]

Surely that relies on the dip/crash in oil prices being similarly long-term - if it's a blip then making trades based on market overreactions would be sensible.

People you've got it backwards.

The effects of a low oil price will be long-term. Now think about who'd benefit from that. The glut is irrelevant yet seems to be the focus for a strategy.

[d000hg]

You sound like a teacher who revels in deluding himself that he's making his class feel stupid.

FTFY.

This trying to sound clever by withholding information sounds a bit like a certain CUKker currently struggling to use WiFi.